I'm still strongly suspecting this whole WAF thing is mostly complete bullshit intended for projects doing security works mostly from spreadsheets. Could someone with a proper background in security confirm or invalidate my suspicion ?
Show HN: BunkerWeb – the open-source and cloud-native WAF
11–20 of 32 posts
Re: Show HN: BunkerWeb – the open-source and cloud-native WAF
#12Since moving to Kubernetes, I haven’t used or evaluated it there yet, but kudos to the team for continuing to update and improve the project. Keep up the great work!
Re: Show HN: BunkerWeb – the open-source and cloud-native WAF
#13Is there a significant difference between this and nginx proxy manager?
They're both reverse proxies built on nginx, but the whole point of BunkerWeb is that it's a WAF, which NPM is not, so that's a significant difference. In short, NPM doesn't do any of the stuff listed under Security Features here: https://docs.bunkerweb.io/latest/#security-features
Re: Show HN: BunkerWeb – the open-source and cloud-native WAF
#14I'm still strongly suspecting this whole WAF thing is mostly complete bullshit intended for projects doing security works mostly from spreadsheets. Could someone with a proper background in security confirm or invalidate my suspicion ?
WAFs have a few valid uses in my opinion: "virtual patching" and the ability to create custom rules such as blocking/challenging/rate limiting obviously bad traffic. But the giant rulesets are actively harmful IMO. "Defense in depth" is not a valid justification for doing something actively harmful to both your users and the time budget of your security team.
Re: Show HN: BunkerWeb – the open-source and cloud-native WAF
#15It also exists as a docker container as an nginx reverse proxy with modsecurity extension.
https://coreruleset.org/docs/6-development/6-6-useful_tools/...
Re: Show HN: BunkerWeb – the open-source and cloud-native WAF
#16What's the benefit of just using plain owasp modsecurity? It also exists as a docker container as an nginx reverse proxy with modsecurity extension. https://coreruleset.org/docs/6-development/6-6-useful_tools/...
Re: Show HN: BunkerWeb – the open-source and cloud-native WAF
#17I just love this project! BunkerWeb was a huge help when I was self-hosting my products with Docker Swarm. It offers tons of configuration options—especially useful for those needing a WAF and dealing with heavy bot traffic. Since moving to Kubernetes, I haven’t used or evaluated it there yet, but kudos to the team for continuing to update and improve the project. Keep up the great work!
Kubernetes integration is really awesome, you can use BunkerWeb ingress controller or mix it with an existing ingress controller.
Re: Show HN: BunkerWeb – the open-source and cloud-native WAF
#18Your site talks of BunkerWeb PRO, which is, by the sound of it, not open source. But I have no idea what is actually different about it: https://panel.bunkerweb.io/knowledgebase/105/What-is-BunkerW... flatly doesn’t answer the question: “additional features and services responding to professional needs” is impressively vague.
Re: Show HN: BunkerWeb – the open-source and cloud-native WAF
#19How is this better than Caddy?
Re: Show HN: BunkerWeb – the open-source and cloud-native WAF
#20Is the syntax same as nginx?