11–17 of 17 posts
I asked it to "add a hamburger to the design" of a 'need inspiration' example and it served an image of a ring with a life like mini hamburger next to the jewel.
Lucky you, I asked it to design a ring like someone gutted a pig and wrapped the intestines around a finger and all I got was a lousy login prompt.
Takes too long to load
It does! I had this running on a potato and I didn't realise people were actually going to see this! Very exciting! EDIT: can you be a bit more specific about which part takes too long to load?
Your connection is working correctly.
Vercel is working correctly.
504: GATEWAY_TIMEOUT Code: FUNCTION_INVOCATION_TIMEOUT ID: iad1::b6d7d-1751062063140-14fa915b731f
Earlier quoted context omitted.
It does! I had this running on a potato and I didn't realise people were actually going to see this! Very exciting! EDIT: can you be a bit more specific about which part takes too long to load?
This Serverless Function has timed out. Your connection is working correctly. Vercel is working correctly. 504: GATEWAY_TIMEOUT Code: FUNCTION_INVOCATION_TIMEOUT ID: iad1::b6d7d-1751062063140-14fa915b731f
A titanium ring with wavy rails on the sides, incorporating flowers in the middle of the band, where the wavy rails move farthest away from each other. The flowers should be a lily, sunflower, and then a spot for a gem, followed by a lily, sunflower, and then a spot for a gem and then a sunflower. The flowers should be evenly spaced around the whole band.
And it got the basics right, looked good, but it put the gem settings between the flowers, where the wavy rails were closest together. I tried several attempts at putting prompts in the "How should we modify this?" box such as "No, the gem settings should be where the flowers are, but every other flower" and "Don't put the gem settings at the points where the wavy edges are closest together" and it just failed hilariously. No matter how I phrased it, it kept putting the gem settings where the rails were closest together. After three (or it might have been four) attempts I gave up.
I could have explained the entire ring to a jeweler in a short paragraph, and any issues with it could be fixed in a sentence or two. I'm not sure why I need a frustrating middleman. And don't feel bad, this applies to nearly everything I use built on LLMs.
It's a cute toy, but boy are LLMs not remotely ready for production anything. I didn't even bother to give it the other aspects of the ring because if it can't get one of the most basic things in four tries of exceedingly clear language, then why would I keep going?
edit: Wow, even tried logging in (with Google)… and it doesn’t even work anyway. Just bounced me back out.
I typed in a long description, was immediately sent to a login page. Nope, goodbye. edit: Wow, even tried logging in (with Google)… and it doesn’t even work anyway. Just bounced me back out.
For context, people have (unsurprisingly?) been putting some pretty gnarly things into the search box so its not obvious to me whether its good to let people put in things like "an octopus hentai ring" and pay to generate that or not. Probably there is a better solution.