Live data from Hacker News

Show HN: Unsure Calculator – back-of-a-napkin probabilistic calculator

filiph.github.io

11–20 of 170 posts

Re: Show HN: Unsure Calculator – back-of-a-napkin probabilistic calculator

#11
I actually stumbled upon this a while ago from social media and the web version has a somewhat annoying latency, so I wrote my own version in Python. It uses numpy so it's faster. https://gist.github.com/kccqzy/d3fa7cdb064e03b16acfbefb76645... Thank you filiph for this brilliant idea!

Re: Show HN: Unsure Calculator – back-of-a-napkin probabilistic calculator

#13

This reminds me of https://www.getguesstimate.com/ , a probabilistic spreadsheet.

The authors of Guesstimate are now working on https://www.squiggle-language.com/

Someone also turned it into the https://github.com/rethinkpriorities/squigglepy python library

Re: Show HN: Unsure Calculator – back-of-a-napkin probabilistic calculator

#14

This reminds me of https://www.getguesstimate.com/ , a probabilistic spreadsheet.

I was looking for this. Seen it (or a similar tool) ages ago.

Want to use it every 3 months or so to pretend that we know what we can squeeze in the roadmap for the quarter.

Re: Show HN: Unsure Calculator – back-of-a-napkin probabilistic calculator

#15
post #11

I actually stumbled upon this a while ago from social media and the web version has a somewhat annoying latency, so I wrote my own version in Python. It uses numpy so it's faster. https://gist.github.com/kccqzy/d3fa7cdb064e03b16acfbefb76645... Thank you filiph for this brilliant idea!

[deleted]

Re: Show HN: Unsure Calculator – back-of-a-napkin probabilistic calculator

#16
post #5
post #4

I perused the codebase but I'm unfamiliar with dart: https://github.com/filiph/unsure/blob/master/lib/src/calcula... I assume this is a montecarlo approach? (Not to start a flamewar, at least for us data scientists :) ).

Yes it is.

Can you explain how? I'm an (aspiring)

Re: Show HN: Unsure Calculator – back-of-a-napkin probabilistic calculator

#17
post #5

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Yes it is.

Can you explain how? I'm an (aspiring)

I didn't peruse the source code. I just read the linked article in its entirety and it says

> The computation is quite slow. In order to stay as flexible as possible, I'm using the Monte Carlo method. Which means the calculator is running about 250K AST-based computations for every calculation you put forth.

So therefore I conclude Monte Carlo is being used.

Post reply on HN