Live data from Hacker News

Show HN: A People Search Engine with Face Recognition

introthem.com

11–20 of 36 posts

Re: Show HN: A People Search Engine with Face Recognition

#11

This is such a cool angle for lead gen. Just the other day, I saw some kids using those Ray-Ban/Meta glasses through Instagram Live feeds to grab publicly available data from people almost in real time. It blew my mind. Sure, this kind of tech will probably go through a lot of scrutiny and for good reason, but whether it’s a consumer product or a custom internal tool, it’s happening. Excited to see where this goes.

Thank you for the feedback :)

Re: Show HN: A People Search Engine with Face Recognition

#13
post #12

I think you need a FAQ. In the FAQ you could explain how its not going to be a useful tool for stalkers because that's where my mind goes, maybe I watch too many DateLines.

Thank you!

Exactly - this won't be useful for stalkers. We don't crawl or index social media pictures.

Will add FAQ section.

Re: Show HN: A People Search Engine with Face Recognition

#14

Earlier quoted context omitted.

You might want to look up Clearview AI, who also took publicly available images, performed biometric recognition on them and ended up with a €30.5 million fine: https://blog.barracuda.com/2024/10/23/clearview-ai-fine-gdpr...

I just did research on this. Clearview vs Introthem: - Clearview does photo-to-photo matching. We don't do that, and I don't think I will ever build that. - You have to provide the name, then we build the faces collection for analyzing at search time and delete it. - We don't retain any face collection once the search is done. I still don't know if I am breaking any laws, but here is how Introthem works.

You should definitely find out if you are breaking any laws.

Re: Show HN: A People Search Engine with Face Recognition

#16

How much have you investigated the legality of this? In the EU biometric data is 'special category data' under the GDPR [0] and can only be processed in very limited circumstances unless you have the consent of the data subject [1] [0] https://www.dataprotection.ie/en/organisations/know-your-obl... [1] https://gdpr-info.eu/art-9-gdpr/

Thanks for the info. We don't use any private data, only publicly available images. So it won't be a problem, in my opinion. I will contact my lawyer and double check this.

Not only the EU, but you will have to check with each of the 50 US states as they all have a patchwork of laws. Illinois was one of the first, but I don't know much about it; I thought I read it was pretty extensive to the point some facial recognition companies specifically exclude it. Texas also has its own version as well, that I know of; again don't know details.

Re: Show HN: A People Search Engine with Face Recognition

#18

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I just did research on this. Clearview vs Introthem: - Clearview does photo-to-photo matching. We don't do that, and I don't think I will ever build that. - You have to provide the name, then we build the faces collection for analyzing at search time and delete it. - We don't retain any face collection once the search is done. I still don't know if I am breaking any laws, but here is how Introthem works.

You should definitely find out if you are breaking any laws.

100% this is illegal in Illinois. They have specific biometric data protections. Probably also a crime elsewhere.

Re: Show HN: A People Search Engine with Face Recognition

#19
So I tried to search myself just to see how terrible/awesome this product is. On attempting to use the free plan:

Error: Failed to subscribe to the plan. You ran out of credits. Please upgrade your Plan

Dark pattern, lack of testing, or incompetence? Please do better if you're contributing to the Orwellian surveillance capitalist state

Re: Show HN: A People Search Engine with Face Recognition

#20

So I tried to search myself just to see how terrible/awesome this product is. On attempting to use the free plan: Error: Failed to subscribe to the plan. You ran out of credits. Please upgrade your Plan Dark pattern, lack of testing, or incompetence? Please do better if you're contributing to the Orwellian surveillance capitalist state

Thank you for trying. We are being rate-limited. We are currently fixing it.

Edit:

Fixed!

Post reply on HN