Show HN: I made a privacy-friendly and free image, audio and video converter
11–20 of 24 posts
Re: Show HN: I made a privacy-friendly and free image, audio and video converter
#12I wish pages like this had a way to specify, in the HEAD tag, that they are to be run in an additional sandbox with zero network access. That way, the user agent could render them in a special way to indicate to the user that it is safe to share data with the app. Because nothing is stopping this app from updating its code after a few weeks in order to begin shipping data. Of course, you can download the page and the…
Also, maybe the user should be able to initiate offline mode for a single page.
Re: Show HN: I made a privacy-friendly and free image, audio and video converter
#13I dig the simplicity, but "mp4" for example is just a container format. Even if you don't make the codecs user-configurable, it'd be nice to know which codecs are being used e.g. "mp4 (h264 + AAC)". Question, does it strip metadata? Because ideally that's what I'd expect from a "privacy-friendly" tool. I let it "convert" one mp4 file into another, and it's taking a while, which makes me think it's doing a full re-enc…
Performance diff: https://ffmpegwasm.netlify.app/docs/performance
Re: Show HN: I made a privacy-friendly and free image, audio and video converter
#14Re: Show HN: I made a privacy-friendly and free image, audio and video converter
#15So this is ffmpeg in the cloud?
Re: Show HN: I made a privacy-friendly and free image, audio and video converter
#16So this is ffmpeg in the cloud?
Re: Show HN: I made a privacy-friendly and free image, audio and video converter
#17I wish pages like this had a way to specify, in the HEAD tag, that they are to be run in an additional sandbox with zero network access. That way, the user agent could render them in a special way to indicate to the user that it is safe to share data with the app. Because nothing is stopping this app from updating its code after a few weeks in order to begin shipping data. Of course, you can download the page and the…
The developer can still change the HTML file, but if they change the script it's easy(ish) to observe that the hash has changed.
GitHub recently introduced[1] an "artifact attestation" system, which is essentially a way to demonstrate that a particular build was built by a particular source tree (although the precise security properties are more subtle than I've summarized here). Combining these two things and writing a static "load the most recent version and verify its integrity" script could be interesting.
[0] https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/Security/Subres...
[1] https://github.blog/2024-05-02-introducing-artifact-attestat...
Re: Show HN: I made a privacy-friendly and free image, audio and video converter
#18I dig the simplicity, but "mp4" for example is just a container format. Even if you don't make the codecs user-configurable, it'd be nice to know which codecs are being used e.g. "mp4 (h264 + AAC)". Question, does it strip metadata? Because ideally that's what I'd expect from a "privacy-friendly" tool. I let it "convert" one mp4 file into another, and it's taking a while, which makes me think it's doing a full re-enc…
Why would you expect that? I expect privacy to mean that the service isn't harvesting my data. I wouldn't expect it to strip the tags from my music.
Re: Show HN: I made a privacy-friendly and free image, audio and video converter
#19My recommendation: think about PDFs. A lot of space for disrupting existing conversion websites there when it comes to speed, privacy, UI/UX. Not even anything complicated: splitting, combining, rotating, compressing, etc.
Re: Show HN: I made a privacy-friendly and free image, audio and video converter
#20I dig the simplicity, but "mp4" for example is just a container format. Even if you don't make the codecs user-configurable, it'd be nice to know which codecs are being used e.g. "mp4 (h264 + AAC)". Question, does it strip metadata? Because ideally that's what I'd expect from a "privacy-friendly" tool. I let it "convert" one mp4 file into another, and it's taking a while, which makes me think it's doing a full re-enc…
> Question, does it strip metadata? Because ideally that's what I'd expect from a "privacy-friendly" tool. Why would you expect that? I expect privacy to mean that the service isn't harvesting my data. I wouldn't expect it to strip the tags from my music.
Of course, ffmpeg can do a lot of things, and I wouldn't expect them all to be supported. But I do expect metadata stripping (at least as an option) from a tool with privacy in the headline.