Half of the fun of using cli is using it with your own knowledge imo. Using GPT3 makes it feel like I may as well use some GUI tool. I understand gpt3 will/does save time and money but I actually like to code and to use my skills and knowledge to build and solve thingswith my own hands. Maybe I'm an outlier here, but using some tool to do it for me doesn't sound like fun.
Show HN: GPT-3 Powered Shell
11–20 of 114 posts
Re: Show HN: GPT-3 Powered Shell
#12Half of the fun of using cli is using it with your own knowledge imo. Using GPT3 makes it feel like I may as well use some GUI tool. I understand gpt3 will/does save time and money but I actually like to code and to use my skills and knowledge to build and solve thingswith my own hands. Maybe I'm an outlier here, but using some tool to do it for me doesn't sound like fun.
Re: Show HN: GPT-3 Powered Shell
#13Half of the fun of using cli is using it with your own knowledge imo. Using GPT3 makes it feel like I may as well use some GUI tool. I understand gpt3 will/does save time and money but I actually like to code and to use my skills and knowledge to build and solve thingswith my own hands. Maybe I'm an outlier here, but using some tool to do it for me doesn't sound like fun.
Re: Show HN: GPT-3 Powered Shell
#14Re: Show HN: GPT-3 Powered Shell
#15Pretty cool! Does anyone know how open-source alternatives like GPT-J compare to ChatGPT? I've heard that it's comparable to GPT-3, but nothing close to GPT-3.5. I'd much prefer using a tool that I know won't eventually be put behind a paywall.
However, I also feel like it hallucinates/gives wrong outputs more. TBH i love what Eleuther is doing and GPT-J has its merits, but it feels not ready for primetime. I'd think of it as most similar to GPT Curie.
Re: Show HN: GPT-3 Powered Shell
#16Half of the fun of using cli is using it with your own knowledge imo. Using GPT3 makes it feel like I may as well use some GUI tool. I understand gpt3 will/does save time and money but I actually like to code and to use my skills and knowledge to build and solve thingswith my own hands. Maybe I'm an outlier here, but using some tool to do it for me doesn't sound like fun.
Re: Show HN: GPT-3 Powered Shell
#17Re: Show HN: GPT-3 Powered Shell
#18Re: Show HN: GPT-3 Powered Shell
#19Half of the fun of using cli is using it with your own knowledge imo. Using GPT3 makes it feel like I may as well use some GUI tool. I understand gpt3 will/does save time and money but I actually like to code and to use my skills and knowledge to build and solve thingswith my own hands. Maybe I'm an outlier here, but using some tool to do it for me doesn't sound like fun.
I don't see how writing CLI commands is similar to building something with your hands. You either know what the switches are or you try running --help, looking at the man pages or search on Google. This looks like an alternative for Google.
Re: Show HN: GPT-3 Powered Shell
#20If you wanted to wash your hands of the Bad Things this might do, I would put a disclaimer somewhere on the site and on the tool's output. Something along the lines of "Running commands produced by this tool may cause damage to your system. Please review each suggestion carefully." Otherwise someone is going to be very upset by a rogue suggestion.