Kids of 2 to 4 shouldn’t be using screens.
Show HN: Made this with my daughter to help kids ages 2 to 4 learn logic
11–20 of 141 posts
Re: Show HN: Made this with my daughter to help kids ages 2 to 4 learn logic
#12Re: Show HN: Made this with my daughter to help kids ages 2 to 4 learn logic
#13Re: Show HN: Made this with my daughter to help kids ages 2 to 4 learn logic
#14So, I am older than 4 and have a PhD in a logic-related field. BUT. I have to admit that I had trouble answering some of those questions. For example: "How many blue cats are not bouncing" when there are no blue cats on the screen. The game seems to assume that the right answer is zero, but I'm not sure I concur. There is a presupposition there about blue cats being in existence and if there are none on screen, the r…
1. Clarifying ambiguity and extrapolating are important logic skills.
2. "How many blue cats are not bouncing" is how people actually talk.
Re: Show HN: Made this with my daughter to help kids ages 2 to 4 learn logic
#15Controversial opinion, but I don't think kids ages 2 to 4 should be having screen time, let alone an activity that is better presented with real objects.
Many people have these "screen time" opinions. I'm not saying I disagree, but why do you think zero screen time is the correct amount?
Re: Show HN: Made this with my daughter to help kids ages 2 to 4 learn logic
#16Also, when the correct answer is revealed, it would be great to somehow highlight the cats that are actually described by the formula. Yes, this is hard for 0.
Also, the animations feel too fast to me. I find they make the whole thing stressful, somehow.
ALSO, when a wrong answer is given, the question disappears! That's terrible UX.
EDIT: I should add that I think the idea is great! But some details of the implementation could be improved.
Re: Show HN: Made this with my daughter to help kids ages 2 to 4 learn logic
#17Can ur kids read numbers?
Re: Show HN: Made this with my daughter to help kids ages 2 to 4 learn logic
#18So, I am older than 4 and have a PhD in a logic-related field. BUT. I have to admit that I had trouble answering some of those questions. For example: "How many blue cats are not bouncing" when there are no blue cats on the screen. The game seems to assume that the right answer is zero, but I'm not sure I concur. There is a presupposition there about blue cats being in existence and if there are none on screen, the r…
While I understand your argument, I think there's value in the ambiguity. 1. Clarifying ambiguity and extrapolating are important logic skills. 2. "How many blue cats are not bouncing" is how people actually talk.
Re: Show HN: Made this with my daughter to help kids ages 2 to 4 learn logic
#19Controversial opinion, but I don't think kids ages 2 to 4 should be having screen time, let alone an activity that is better presented with real objects.
Why? Many people have these "screen time" opinions. I'm not saying I disagree, but why do you think zero screen time is the correct amount?
Re: Show HN: Made this with my daughter to help kids ages 2 to 4 learn logic
#20Controversial opinion, but I don't think kids ages 2 to 4 should be having screen time, let alone an activity that is better presented with real objects.