Earlier quoted context omitted.
These are criticisms people say on the streets, and they vague, empty and lack explanation. Although I also find your answers vague and empty, it's nice that you tried to answer them. Anyway, I think it is safe to ignore that discussion, because it is way too common and biased. My humble suggestion is that you should start on the purely economic side of the high-level discussion. This[1] is something that raised a lo…
Thanks. I did some research on that book. The 'economic calculation problem' seems to be the main point. I disagree that market forces are the only way to price goods and services. Why can't goods be priced that factor in the aspect of supply and demand, but also factor in the cost of offering those goods and services, both the immediate cost and the cost to the environment? It doesn't seem like an impossible problem…
See, for example, Oskar Lange and Henry Douglas Dickinson proposals, and Friedrich Hayek's rebuttals.
What I am begging you is to stop thinking you have all the right answers before getting to know what other people have already said on the topic.