I'm not a user of any of those stacks, but I love the name! :)
Sounds like a stack Reggie Watts would create. But then there is the node/js fronted community to one up everyone. Does your stack manage complexity, or add too it... Why is such a stack necessary. I bet you don't even ARIA bro...
Show HN: Jolteon – Babel/Electron/React/Browserify/Sass application stack
11–20 of 20 posts
The current state of js libraries may be a bit unfortunate and often frustratingly complex to manage. That's no reason to get all snappy though – the rails stack has about the same number of components, they're just integrated more tightly.
Re: Show HN: Jolteon – Babel/Electron/React/Browserify/Sass application stack
#12Re: Show HN: Jolteon – Babel/Electron/React/Browserify/Sass application stack
#13I thought all the cool kids were using webpack instead of browserify now?
Re: Show HN: Jolteon – Babel/Electron/React/Browserify/Sass application stack
#14I thought all the cool kids were using webpack instead of browserify now?
And using npm scripts instead of gulp?
Re: Show HN: Jolteon – Babel/Electron/React/Browserify/Sass application stack
#15I'm not a user of any of those stacks, but I love the name! :)
It's a Pokemon name.
Re: Show HN: Jolteon – Babel/Electron/React/Browserify/Sass application stack
#16Re: Show HN: Jolteon – Babel/Electron/React/Browserify/Sass application stack
#17Thanks for putting this together. Feature request: A branch that includes redux. https://github.com/reactjs/redux
I'm using this: https://github.com/chentsulin/electron-react-boilerplate
I find it excellent.
Re: Show HN: Jolteon – Babel/Electron/React/Browserify/Sass application stack
#18Earlier quoted context omitted.
And using npm scripts instead of gulp?
You use npm scripts instead of grunt not gulp. ;)
The highly popular React Starter Kit disagrees:
https://github.com/kriasoft/react-starter-kit/commit/ed14145...