11–20 of 43 posts
This looks really interesting, thanks for sharing. I'm finding it quite difficult to read through the main page however, as there's something going on with the scrolling. It's hyper-sensitive, then when there are animations on the page they play through before jumping me really far.
A shame that the page has to hijack the scroll functionality, it makes for a very unpleasant "lumpy" feeling scrolling. Chrome Version 46.0.2490.80 (64-bit) on OS X Yosemite.
A shame that the page has to hijack the scroll functionality, it makes for a very unpleasant "lumpy" feeling scrolling. Chrome Version 46.0.2490.80 (64-bit) on OS X Yosemite.
The parallax scrolling on the landing page does seem to go a little too far. We'll fix it soon. Thanks!
The product seems interesting anyway!
I think it is a shame that most projects have only documentation in the form of one-liners for each function/variable/class. Those one-liners really don't mean much if you don't have a picture of the global architecture in your mind. That is far more important.
I think it is a shame that most projects have only documentation in the form of one-liners for each function/variable/class. Those one-liners really don't mean much if you don't have a picture of the global architecture in your mind. That is far more important.
This is one of the things I really like about Doxygen, the ability to automatically generate relationship maps between libraries and inheritance.
But the difference of Sodocan is that it then sends these JSON files to an API server, which hosts these documentations?
So basically instead of using JSDoc + static site generator, one would use this method?
And the benefit would be that the generated documentation would be crowdsourced?
is it compatible with jsdoc?
If you would like to some real examples of documentation created using Sodocan.js, check out http://jesterswilde.github.io/hashids/ and http://liujoycec.github.io/jwt-simple/ . These are both created from the Blueprints template Sodone. These templates are also open-source, and we would love for you to help us improve them and add more templates!
- text is too light and hard to read. Color contrast between text and background could be higher.
- up/down arrows do nothing
- plus button shows login dialog, but you can't register from there
- TP/EX/DE buttons are not in same order as their respective sections
- missing alt text on icon buttons, so it's not clear what they do (or rather, what they're supposed to do, since some do nothing)
- like button shows wrong cursor on hover
- buttons in settings dialog do nothing
- example has no code highlighting when present