Live data from Hacker News

Show HN: AgentMail – Email infra for AI agents

chat.agentmail.to

1–10 of 74 posts

Show HN: AgentMail – Email infra for AI agents

#1
Hey HN, we're Haakam, Michael, and Adi. We're building AgentMail (https://agentmail.to/), an API to give AI agents their own email inboxes. We’re not talking about AI for your email, this is email for your AI.

We started building email agents because they can converse with users in their inboxes, automate email-based workflows, and authenticate with third-party applications. Given these unique capabilities, we think email will be a core interface for agents.

But we were building on top of Gmail, which was a struggle: poor API support, expensive subscriptions, rate limits, sending limits, GCP Pub/Sub, OAuth, crappy keyword search, and an overall terrible developer experience.

Gmail and other providers didn’t work for us. So we decided to bite the bullet and build our own.

AgentMail is like Gmail, but API-first, with programmatic inbox creation, events over webhooks and websockets, simple API key auth, organization-wide semantic search, structured data extraction, and usage-based pricing that scales with emails sent/received.

Here’s a demo of building an email agent: https://youtu.be/1V7BISeFUTM, and here’s a demo of a voice agent with its own email inbox: https://youtu.be/eG2fCsRK4RY

So far AgentMail has been deployed to use cases such as apps with dedicated inboxes for each user, voice agents that receive documents in real time, automated account provisioning and QA testing, cold outbound platforms with thousands of inboxes, automations for processing invoices, and agents that coordinate work with humans and other agents.

We would love to hear your thoughts and feedback. You can try our playground at https://chat.agentmail.to

Show HN: AgentMail – Email infra for AI agents
chat.agentmail.to

Re: Show HN: AgentMail – Email infra for AI agents

#3
post #2

Dejavu What is the benefit of an AI email infra over using any other generic email api provider like SES, azure communication, sendgrid, mailchimp

The homepage has a feature comparison with Sendgrid. Sendgrid doesn't have email receiving, inboxes, attachment parsing.

Re: Show HN: AgentMail – Email infra for AI agents

#5
post #3
post #2

Dejavu What is the benefit of an AI email infra over using any other generic email api provider like SES, azure communication, sendgrid, mailchimp

The homepage has a feature comparison with Sendgrid. Sendgrid doesn't have email receiving, inboxes, attachment parsing.

Yes it does. As far as I recall, all major email providers handle inbound email. Sendgrid, Postmark, Mailgun, SparkPost, AWS SES.

(I don’t think this compromises the value of AgentMail, just clarifying what is supported elsewhere.)

Re: Show HN: AgentMail – Email infra for AI agents

#7
post #5
post #3

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The homepage has a feature comparison with Sendgrid. Sendgrid doesn't have email receiving, inboxes, attachment parsing.

Yes it does. As far as I recall, all major email providers handle inbound email. Sendgrid, Postmark, Mailgun, SparkPost, AWS SES. (I don’t think this compromises the value of AgentMail, just clarifying what is supported elsewhere.)

Yes, some providers support receiving via webhooks (or some other notification), but lack the inbox infrastructure that Gmail and AgentMail offer.

Re: Show HN: AgentMail – Email infra for AI agents

#10
post #8
post #2

Dejavu What is the benefit of an AI email infra over using any other generic email api provider like SES, azure communication, sendgrid, mailchimp

good point. i guess really the comparison is SES not gmail

Happy to add some color here. SES and other APIs lack inboxes, email threading, attachment parsing, semantic search, structured data extraction, and more.
Post reply on HN