Show HN: Imagine a search engine that removed top million sites from its index
1–10 of 204 posts
Re: Show HN: Imagine a search engine that removed top million sites from its index
#2Turns out removing the top million results from a search for Google... still returns google. Or google.com.au to be precise.
It's a cool idea, but I'm not sure it's working. I tried "american history" but it wouldn't return anything at all if I changed the "Remove the Top" dropdown.
Re: Show HN: Imagine a search engine that removed top million sites from its index
#3[deleted]
Re: Show HN: Imagine a search engine that removed top million sites from its index
#4very interesting hack. thanks for doing it
Re: Show HN: Imagine a search engine that removed top million sites from its index
#5I think remove results with my search term in the domain name and this would be perfect!
For example I searched for how to start a garden and I can guarantee that startagarden.com is junk. But indie see some useful advice from small blogs etc
Re: Show HN: Imagine a search engine that removed top million sites from its index
#6It doesn't appear to work. I did a search for aspirin and the top match returned by this is #5 doing the same search with Google.
Re: Show HN: Imagine a search engine that removed top million sites from its index
#7[deleted]
Re: Show HN: Imagine a search engine that removed top million sites from its index
#8It doesn't appear to work. I did a search for aspirin and the top match returned by this is #5 doing the same search with Google.
We're simply removing the top million (or what you select) sites. The results can be the same - it just means that that site isn't in the list of top one million sites on the web.
Re: Show HN: Imagine a search engine that removed top million sites from its index
#9It doesn't appear to work. I did a search for aspirin and the top match returned by this is #5 doing the same search with Google.
Top million sites, not top million results.
Re: Show HN: Imagine a search engine that removed top million sites from its index
#10I like this idea a lot. I came across a nice, concise explanation of a Buffer overflow