1–10 of 161 posts
Show HN: Inshellisense – IDE style shell autocomplete
github.com
Ya, cool name, but worse privacy than gorilla, more awkward than llm.sh and why would I ever get the Microsoft version of something I can get elsewhere without the worry that I'm about to be devoured by a corporate anglerfish.
Ya, cool name, but worse privacy than gorilla, more awkward than llm.sh and why would I ever get the Microsoft version of something I can get elsewhere without the worry that I'm about to be devoured by a corporate anglerfish.
I recall disabling bash_completion.sh on my computer some time ago due to its negative impact on the startup speed of each iTerm2 session and the delay it introduced when using the key for autocompletion.
Before I disabled this feature, I consistently experienced delays of over 300ms between triggering autocomplete and receiving the actual results. I must admit that this was on an Intel Core i7, so I assume the performance is much better with newer processors. However, even after more than two years without bash_completion.sh, I have already committed many command line tool flags to memory so I would only consider using a tool written in a compiled programming language that can provide autocomplete in 100ms or less, potentially requiring the inclusion of hardcoded information in the binary.
Ya, cool name, but worse privacy than gorilla, more awkward than llm.sh and why would I ever get the Microsoft version of something I can get elsewhere without the worry that I'm about to be devoured by a corporate anglerfish.
Did you check the page? It's MIT-licensed and isn't about GPT or text generation. It's Intellisense, for the shell.