The “Show HN” link itself got 5 points (as of now), and 1 comment. Not bad, but really close to bad though. We did get a fair amount of traffic:
288 sessions, 241 users (over Monday 18th August and Tuesday 19th August -- compared to 99 sessions and 71 users the Monday-Tuesday before). We have a video on the front page which was viewed 45 times (18% of users). The video percentage is good I find.
Q1: is 241 users a “normal” average for HN? Or is that “well, no, there seemed to have been little interest in your product. that’s the clue. take it.”
Q2: is it normal that 241 users result in roughly 5 points and 1 comment. Or is it again about taking the hard truth, and “yeah, no, no-one really liked your stuff”?
Regarding sign-ups for the free trial, the situation got even bleaker: 2 sign-ups in that period.
Q3: Is that “well, there was a video which reached 18% so HN readers are not that interested in signing up, as they want to give you feedback, which they could based on the video.”?
Q4: Is that “well, you indicate that this would be a paying service after the 1 month free trial” so there is a huge wall stopping people from trying something where they feel they will not want to pay that kind of money (3.99 per month) anyway?
Q5: Or (and this is open-ended), are there any “well, I think this and this should be improved on the landing page, I think that could explain the few sign-ups”?
Q6: Or, well, we are just not that into you (the product)?
Thanks a lot; I hope that with your help I can let this data “speak” a bit better to me such that we can appropriate actions!