Is it because hackers/geeks are inherently unsocial?
Ask HN: Why don't "geeks" use Geeklist?
1–10 of 16 posts
Re: Ask HN: Why don't "geeks" use Geeklist?
#2I do not need 'badges', 'gamification', 'likes', 'high fives', 'regeeks', or any of the other bullshit that sites like Geeklist offer.
Also, Geeklist doesn't appear to have any actual information on it (see, for example, http://geekli.st/rekatz/links/15535). An entire page wasted on pictures of the submitter, social buttons, statistics, etc.
Re: Ask HN: Why don't "geeks" use Geeklist?
#3Re: Ask HN: Why don't "geeks" use Geeklist?
#4Re: Ask HN: Why don't "geeks" use Geeklist?
#5Yet another aggregator? No thanks!
Re: Ask HN: Why don't "geeks" use Geeklist?
#6The real geeks are still on Usenet.
Re: Ask HN: Why don't "geeks" use Geeklist?
#7I can understand them wanting to grow their network, but the damn thing won't let me unsubscribe because I can't log in (forgot password).
I've noticed quite a few sites hiding unsubscribe buttons behind a login wall lately. It's slimy, and not what I would expect from a site aimed at geeks.
Re: Ask HN: Why don't "geeks" use Geeklist?
#8The real geeks are still on Usenet.
Re: Ask HN: Why don't "geeks" use Geeklist?
#9I use HN. I do not need 'badges', 'gamification', 'likes', 'high fives', 'regeeks', or any of the other bullshit that sites like Geeklist offer. Also, Geeklist doesn't appear to have any actual information on it (see, for example, http://geekli.st/rekatz/links/15535 ). An entire page wasted on pictures of the submitter, social buttons, statistics, etc.
Re: Ask HN: Why don't "geeks" use Geeklist?
#10It's not apparent why it's useful for me. And it probably isn't. Yet another aggregator? No thanks!