We are facing flooding and surge in PRs across the teams. AI reviewer tools are good, but not exactly helping in efficiency. Almost all developers are experiencing velocity gains in programming but it's not resulting into eventual productivity or velocity in roadmap. How are you or your org dealing with all this?
Ask HN: How is your org managing PR review load as AI multiplies code output?
1–10 of 28 posts
Re: Ask HN: How is your org managing PR review load as AI multiplies code output?
#2Cut by half AI usage. Works wonders. Focus on the good stuff, ignore the rest
Re: Ask HN: How is your org managing PR review load as AI multiplies code output?
#3Skipping most reviews and waiting for disasters to happen.
Re: Ask HN: How is your org managing PR review load as AI multiplies code output?
#4[flagged]
Re: Ask HN: How is your org managing PR review load as AI multiplies code output?
#5[flagged]
Re: Ask HN: How is your org managing PR review load as AI multiplies code output?
#6[flagged]
Re: Ask HN: How is your org managing PR review load as AI multiplies code output?
#7[deleted]
Re: Ask HN: How is your org managing PR review load as AI multiplies code output?
#8[deleted]
Re: Ask HN: How is your org managing PR review load as AI multiplies code output?
#9[flagged]
Re: Ask HN: How is your org managing PR review load as AI multiplies code output?
#10We’re seeing much higher PR volume from AI-generated code, but review time hasn’t improved, so PR review has become the main bottleneck instead of coding.