Live data from Hacker News

Ask HN: How many people got VPNs in response to laws like UK Online Safety Act?

news.ycombinator.com

1–10 of 90 posts

Ask HN: How many people got VPNs in response to laws like UK Online Safety Act?

#1
I was reading The Free Press (thefp.com) from London and an article was automatically blocked to ensure conformance with the UK Online Safety Act. I thought the site was broken. It took a few minutes to diagnose the problem. 15 minutes later I had Mullvad installed and was back online.

Talk about unintended consequences. How many other people have done the same?

Re: Ask HN: How many people got VPNs in response to laws like UK Online Safety Act?

#2
I did despite being quite resistant to the idea at first. Eventually I didn't have a choice, as many things I wanted to read were suddenly hidden. I am paranoid however and worry that the VPN maker is tracking me, but there is only so much I can be paranoid about in the day.

Re: Ask HN: How many people got VPNs in response to laws like UK Online Safety Act?

#3
I was trying to follow a tutorial the other day and couldn't because the embedded images were on Imgur and it was so frustrating. It was the straw that broke the camel's back.

I caved, bought a 3 year PIA plan, had my router configured within about 2 minutes (actually impressed how straightforward Unifi made it) and now my browsing experience is fixed.

Re: Ask HN: How many people got VPNs in response to laws like UK Online Safety Act?

#5
post #3

I was trying to follow a tutorial the other day and couldn't because the embedded images were on Imgur and it was so frustrating. It was the straw that broke the camel's back. I caved, bought a 3 year PIA plan, had my router configured within about 2 minutes (actually impressed how straightforward Unifi made it) and now my browsing experience is fixed.

By putting it on your router, all your traffic is tunneled through the VPN, right?

I ask this in comparison to applying it at a finer-grained level, such as just a particular machine, or to an application, or to even a browser tab or particular domain. I feel like I would never want all my traffic VPN-ed because it is slow, there are greater privacy concerns of VPN operators, and my needs for VPNs are a cleanly-separable small chunk of my online activities.

Re: Ask HN: How many people got VPNs in response to laws like UK Online Safety Act?

#6
I should mention that what pushed me over the edge was discovering that the FP problem was [among other things] triggered by a user comment that was then suppressed. However, it had a helpful message that I could solve the problem by uploading identification information to a website somewhere that I've never heard of.

Given the rate at which those sites are hacked, that's basically the following, simple procedure:

Step 1: Share your identifying information with the entire Internet.

Re: Ask HN: How many people got VPNs in response to laws like UK Online Safety Act?

#7
post #3

I was trying to follow a tutorial the other day and couldn't because the embedded images were on Imgur and it was so frustrating. It was the straw that broke the camel's back. I caved, bought a 3 year PIA plan, had my router configured within about 2 minutes (actually impressed how straightforward Unifi made it) and now my browsing experience is fixed.

By putting it on your router, all your traffic is tunneled through the VPN, right? I ask this in comparison to applying it at a finer-grained level, such as just a particular machine, or to an application, or to even a browser tab or particular domain. I feel like I would never want all my traffic VPN-ed because it is slow, there are greater privacy concerns of VPN operators, and my needs for VPNs are a cleanly-separ…

I'm planning to turn the VPN off when I don't need it. Mullvad is nice because you can just put money on the meter when you are traveling to locations that make it necessary.

Re: Ask HN: How many people got VPNs in response to laws like UK Online Safety Act?

#8
post #3

I was trying to follow a tutorial the other day and couldn't because the embedded images were on Imgur and it was so frustrating. It was the straw that broke the camel's back. I caved, bought a 3 year PIA plan, had my router configured within about 2 minutes (actually impressed how straightforward Unifi made it) and now my browsing experience is fixed.

By putting it on your router, all your traffic is tunneled through the VPN, right? I ask this in comparison to applying it at a finer-grained level, such as just a particular machine, or to an application, or to even a browser tab or particular domain. I feel like I would never want all my traffic VPN-ed because it is slow, there are greater privacy concerns of VPN operators, and my needs for VPNs are a cleanly-separ…

Depending on the configuration it could be selective, I'm Ike routing only imgur through VPN.

Re: Ask HN: How many people got VPNs in response to laws like UK Online Safety Act?

#9
I got one to bypass Arizona's internet ID law. It put a crimp in my watching of adult entertainment (for science). Although I don't live in Arizona, IP geo mappers disagree. Borders contain censorship about as well as they contain invasive species.
Post reply on HN