Ask HN: Why doesn't AI use dynamical neurons instead of static activations?
1–8 of 8 posts
Re: Ask HN: Why doesn't AI use dynamical neurons instead of static activations?
#2Re: Ask HN: Why doesn't AI use dynamical neurons instead of static activations?
#3I guess it's impossible to simulate billions of dynamical neurons with current computer architecture, it is limited by memory bandwidth.
Re: Ask HN: Why doesn't AI use dynamical neurons instead of static activations?
#4Re: Ask HN: Why doesn't AI use dynamical neurons instead of static activations?
#5Dynamical neurons are not used because they add enormous computational cost and instability for limited practical gain.
Re: Ask HN: Why doesn't AI use dynamical neurons instead of static activations?
#6I guess it's impossible to simulate billions of dynamical neurons with current computer architecture, it is limited by memory bandwidth.
I agree, but maybe there is no need for billions of neurons to be simulated right away. Artificial neural networks were pretty small at the time.
Re: Ask HN: Why doesn't AI use dynamical neurons instead of static activations?
#7Earlier quoted context omitted.
I agree, but maybe there is no need for billions of neurons to be simulated right away. Artificial neural networks were pretty small at the time.
and they did not do much
Re: Ask HN: Why doesn't AI use dynamical neurons instead of static activations?
#8Dynamical neurons are not used because they add enormous computational cost and instability for limited practical gain.
What do you mean by "they add instability"?