Ask HN: Do personal projects feel less fun with LLMs?
1–6 of 6 posts
Re: Ask HN: Do personal projects feel less fun with LLMs?
#2My personal projects are the outcomes (solving problems), not the code. The code is just a sometimes necessary means to an end. If the robot solves my problems, tremendous! It means I can solve more problems that tickle my brain faster. This is why I desire a continuously improving robot: we solve problems together, mostly for fun and rarely for profit.
Pick puzzles that are most fun for you. If the puzzles are not fun, look for novel puzzles to explore.
Re: Ask HN: Do personal projects feel less fun with LLMs?
#3Re: Ask HN: Do personal projects feel less fun with LLMs?
#4Interesting observation. There was a thread here recently about LLMs and Art where the OP wh likewise felt unmotivated due to LLMs was accused of creating Art for egotistical reasons. I generally think of my personal projects like I think about Art. Sure the motivation is not 100% this, but it is at least 50% about a sense of accomplishment and bragging rights. LLMs destroy this motivation by making it possible for a…
Re: Ask HN: Do personal projects feel less fun with LLMs?
#5I am a mediocre software person (because I was some combination of unable and unwilling to commit the time needed to become good at it earlier in due to life circumstances), but love to solve problems. I love LLMs because of this; while I can appreciate beautiful and elegant code I couldn’t write myself, I just want to solve problems. My personal projects are the outcomes (solving problems), not the code. The code is…
Re: Ask HN: Do personal projects feel less fun with LLMs?
#6LLMs have let me knock out a few of the ones on The Big List that have been there for years and are now usable tools in my repertoire, and I think that's great. They're not human-quality artisinal code, but so what? It's mine and it works and I can now keep using it and polishing as I proceed.. it wouldn't have been available at all without the LLM assistance.