https://course.fast.ai/
https://www.deeplearning.ai/courses/
Andrej Karpathy youtube and github:
https://www.youtube.com/@AndrejKarpathy/videos
1–10 of 12 posts
https://course.fast.ai/
https://www.deeplearning.ai/courses/
Andrej Karpathy youtube and github:
https://www.youtube.com/@AndrejKarpathy/videos
“If you learn all of these, you’ll know 90% of what matters” (313 points, 2 months ago, 110 comments) https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40397806
ASK: How do I learn more about LLMs and ML? (35 points, 4 months ago, 17 comments) https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=39950683
AI is very broad. I think the future is neurosymbolic, and these two books only cover a tiny part of symbolic, mostly concerned with probabilistic and causal models. See Murphy vol 2 sections V-VI. Lots of interesting ideas for symbolic AI can be found in the SAT and theorem proving literature.
Related: “If you learn all of these, you’ll know 90% of what matters” (313 points, 2 months ago, 110 comments) https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40397806 ASK: How do I learn more about LLMs and ML? (35 points, 4 months ago, 17 comments) https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=39950683
Maybe next time instead of trying to prove a question has been answered, just answer the damned question with fresh or relevant information. Welcome to an aggregate site. Expect repetition.
Related: “If you learn all of these, you’ll know 90% of what matters” (313 points, 2 months ago, 110 comments) https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40397806 ASK: How do I learn more about LLMs and ML? (35 points, 4 months ago, 17 comments) https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=39950683
Low-effort replies like this need to die. Did you read through the comments on either link you lazily dug up? OP is looking for a structured learning, not a jumble of 30 academic papers with questions surrounding the legitimacy. OP also already linked Karpathy's videos favored by your second link. Maybe next time instead of trying to prove a question has been answered, just answer the damned question with fresh or re…
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Low-effort replies like this need to die. Did you read through the comments on either link you lazily dug up? OP is looking for a structured learning, not a jumble of 30 academic papers with questions surrounding the legitimacy. OP also already linked Karpathy's videos favored by your second link. Maybe next time instead of trying to prove a question has been answered, just answer the damned question with fresh or re…
you're complaining to a bot