Ask HN: What do you use for note-taking or as knowledge base?
1–10 of 21 posts
Re: Ask HN: What do you use for note-taking or as knowledge base?
#2Re: Ask HN: What do you use for note-taking or as knowledge base?
#3It allows you to easily write beautiful notes, and add complex blocks (such as a Kanban board, images, columns, etc). What's unique about it is that:
1. It's fast, really fast for a complex block editor. Built with Qt C++ and QML it's actually faster than comparable native apps.
2. Each note is just a simple plaintext in the underlying data (although currently stored in a database, but in a future update we'll convert the database to an arbitrary folder).
So you can create beautiful and advanced notes easily, in a non-proprietary format (when that future update arrives). All while using a resource efficient and fast software that is cross-platform.
Re: Ask HN: What do you use for note-taking or as knowledge base?
#4A few consistent themes are: - Markdown is important
- Syncing or at least access between devices is crucial - hence the OneNote and Notion. Love the Firefox collections and "send tab to device" feature
- any iOS use means that an open source unified solution will be well nigh impossible
Re: Ask HN: What do you use for note-taking or as knowledge base?
#5Re: Ask HN: What do you use for note-taking or as knowledge base?
#6I use . as a hierarchy delimiter, so file extensions are just part of the hierarchy, and I can have multiple files with the same name except for the extension. For example, "film.spongebob.png" is a photo of spongebob, "film.spongebob.org" is a note about spongebob, and "film.spongebob.s1.e7.avi" is my favorite episode.
I use org-roam [1] for note-taking and task/time-management. I absolutely require a plain-text system so it either had to be markdown or org-mode. Emacs was the deciding factor, else I would have still been using Dendron [2]
If OneNote is your thing, I'd probably recommend Obsidian [3] over org-roam. Despite it being the greatest program ever created, Emacs is a lot to learn "just" for taking notes.
If you like VS Code, check out Dendron. It's the one that got me into more serious PKMS instead of just chucking notes in a folder all willy nilly.
- [1]: https://www.orgroam.com/
- [2]: https://www.dendron.so/
- [3]: https://obsidian.md/
Re: Ask HN: What do you use for note-taking or as knowledge base?
#7It's not as good as One Note but it the best I was able to find. If you have some better suggestion I'm all hears!
Re: Ask HN: What do you use for note-taking or as knowledge base?
#8- Most notes are ephemeral anyway. The other day, I found a box of folders from my 20s (a long time ago), and it was just a dusty "curiosity box". We change, and the world changes.
- LLMs are already at the level where you can literally just put all your digital stuff in and then have a usefull conversation with it. We just need better open integration, efficient local models...
My only rule for lesset structured data (= note-taking) is that the tool must support my "current" process of thought, not any hypothetical future need. I use outliners for that.
My only rule for the more structured data (= KM bases) is that I can potentially merge the data together (CSV will do) and use it in any interface I like (good filtering...)
Re: Ask HN: What do you use for note-taking or as knowledge base?
#9Note-taking apps are a really crowded space and there are die-hards in every camp. It sounds trite, but I'm convinced the best one is the one that sticks and that you actually use.
Re: Ask HN: What do you use for note-taking or as knowledge base?
#10It sounds like a lot of people detail each and every day, and I just don't understand the point. I'm also someone who enjoys writing a lot, but those are usually about specific topics. Not just my life ad-nauseam. It sounds like a chore to do all the things people in this thread are talking about
I've tried using programs like OneNote or Obsidian, and found that I configure it, use it once, and then literally never open the application again. Whatever I wrote was not important enough to ever read again for some reason.