Ask HN: Would more people take public transportation if it had business class?
1–10 of 58 posts
Re: Ask HN: Would more people take public transportation if it had business class?
#2Re: Ask HN: Would more people take public transportation if it had business class?
#3Re: Ask HN: Would more people take public transportation if it had business class?
#4That said, I don't think the lack of higher class options is the reason why people don't use public transport. Some other reasons I could think of:
- People (especially once they get used to it), might prefer to travel alone or with people they know (compared to strangers);
- For some, public transport can feel limiting, as you're bound to a limited schedule and predestined routes;
- Public transport can't and won't satisfy all the needs all travellers have, due to reasons above and others;
Re: Ask HN: Would more people take public transportation if it had business class?
#5Similarly, I can recline and nap on an Uber from San Francisco. Not so on the Caltrain.
Re: Ask HN: Would more people take public transportation if it had business class?
#6Many train lines across the world do have the concept of classes. First class trains have more room and nicer amenities.
Re: Ask HN: Would more people take public transportation if it had business class?
#7The reason for this "no" depends on whether we're talking about an area where public transport is highly developed (e.g. most urban areas of Western Europe and Japan) or areas in which it is underfunded and underdeveloped and is mostly seen as transport for poor people (e.g. most of the USA except NYC).
In the case of developed public transportation the answer is no, because simply adding first class would decrease capacity, which at rush hour is already at its limits. Hence, while a first class may attract a few new users, it would necessarily decrease the overall capacity of the system resulting in fewer users overall.
In the case of underdeveloped transportation, the answer is also no. The reason is that simply adding a first class to an insufficiently planned and inefficient network would still be little more than a more comfortable alternative for the less poor users to use said inefficient and insufficiently planned network through the city. In other words, the only people who would use it were those who were already doing so, be it out of principle (environmentalism), necessity (foreign students) or convenience (the bus just happens to be the perfect route to work and they can read a book on it), but who can actually afford this newly introduced first class. So, no net gain in terms of users.
If you want to increase the number of users of public transportation you don't need first class. You need more capacity and better and more efficient networks.
Re: Ask HN: Would more people take public transportation if it had business class?
#8If by "public transportation" we restrict ourselves to short-range metropolitan services, as used for commuting, all else being equal then the answer is no. The reason for this "no" depends on whether we're talking about an area where public transport is highly developed (e.g. most urban areas of Western Europe and Japan) or areas in which it is underfunded and underdeveloped and is mostly seen as transport for poor…
Re: Ask HN: Would more people take public transportation if it had business class?
#9Yes. Comfort, security and services definitely limit public transport’s appeal. Consider the difference, in New York, between taking a ferry and the subway. Similarly, I can recline and nap on an Uber from San Francisco. Not so on the Caltrain.
I’d befriended the operators/conductors on my routes and they’d always tell me when there was a nice open spot somewhere too during rush hour.
But I do agree with your point that the comfort did leave something to want for. That, and security. Napping on public transit is an easy way to get pick pocketed.
Re: Ask HN: Would more people take public transportation if it had business class?
#10If by "public transportation" we restrict ourselves to short-range metropolitan services, as used for commuting, all else being equal then the answer is no. The reason for this "no" depends on whether we're talking about an area where public transport is highly developed (e.g. most urban areas of Western Europe and Japan) or areas in which it is underfunded and underdeveloped and is mostly seen as transport for poor…
A big issue with public transit is that it gets you to the ballpark of where you want to go but your commute from there might still be lengthy enough that you need to call an Uber anyway.
A lot of cities tend to have really great main trunk transit, but things get really sparse coming off of the trunks. Having better options for spreading out from the trunks would really help