Hacker News Board Hacker News, browsed like a classic message board
Live data from Hacker News

Ask HN: Transition from Web to Embedded

news.ycombinator.com

Post reply on HN
Print view View original

1–10 of 12 posts

Ask HN: Transition from Web to Embedded

#1

Post by langsa »

I have been doing web development for about 5 years now and am at a point now where I am getting pretty bored. I'm 32 and have a degree in Electrical Engineering from a good engineering school in the states, but it's been a long time since I've used it.

I'm wondering if anyone has transitioned from web dev into doing more lower level firmware type programming for a job. How did this go? Do you have any advice? Was there some kind of curriculum you followed?

I am worried that specializing more will lead to fewer job opportunities, but I find myself gravitating more towards embedded types of projects in my free time and enjoying them much more than I do any kind of work I do during my day job.

Re: Ask HN: Transition from Web to Embedded

#3

Post by AlotOfReading »

ChuckNorris89 wrote: post #2

I'm trying to do the transition as well but in the opposite direction. I like embedded far more than web development but depending on where you live it's tough to find good jobs with decent pay in the west.

I feel like a large part of embedded is just telling people to stop counting BOM pennies and buy COTS. It ends up cheaper a shocking majority of the time. I've toyed around with the idea of moving up the stack, but I don't know if pushing protobufs around full-time is any less tedious.

Re: Ask HN: Transition from Web to Embedded

#4

Post by ChuckNorris89 »

AlotOfReading wrote: post #3
ChuckNorris89 wrote: post #2

I'm trying to do the transition as well but in the opposite direction. I like embedded far more than web development but depending on where you live it's tough to find good jobs with decent pay in the west.

I feel like a large part of embedded is just telling people to stop counting BOM pennies and buy COTS. It ends up cheaper a shocking majority of the time. I've toyed around with the idea of moving up the stack, but I don't know if pushing protobufs around full-time is any less tedious.

Depends. I've done embedded in high margin products like precision measuring equipment and semiconductors and low margin products like automotive or advertising electronics. Pay and software is mor or less the same, what varies is the amount of bureocracy, documentation and requirements engineering.

Getting good pay means you have to find a Fang with high margins on their HW like Apple or Nvidia or go HFT.

Re: Ask HN: Transition from Web to Embedded

#5

Post by 2rsf »

I kind of moved the other direction and worked with people like you moving from "high level" development to embedded.

The first thing to note is that "Embedded" is a very wide area, a lot of it is not too special and you might continue doing web development as you are used to, maybe with small adjustment of how you load, debug and communicate with your device.

It's the lower layers, mainly device drivers and BSP (Board Support Package) but even some algorithms close to the hardware or special optimizations, where things becomes interesting and requires specialization.

I worked on those lower layers and have found myself more than once debugging "real software" using a logic analyzer or other Electrical Engineering tools to catch a software problem.

How did it go for those transitioning "down" into embedded? usually quite well, you will need to catch up with the technology, learn some new concepts and make a change in the way you think of things, for example memory or multi processing, but it is definitely doable and enjoyable.

Re: Ask HN: Transition from Web to Embedded

#6

Post by iExploder »

AlotOfReading wrote: post #3
ChuckNorris89 wrote: post #2

I'm trying to do the transition as well but in the opposite direction. I like embedded far more than web development but depending on where you live it's tough to find good jobs with decent pay in the west.

I feel like a large part of embedded is just telling people to stop counting BOM pennies and buy COTS. It ends up cheaper a shocking majority of the time. I've toyed around with the idea of moving up the stack, but I don't know if pushing protobufs around full-time is any less tedious.

seems to me like buffer pushers would be more viable for FANGS. embedded is fun and interesting but for individual contributor / engineer there is not much money in it. might as well open up a shop backing up ssd drives and reinstalling windows for grandmas.

Re: Ask HN: Transition from Web to Embedded

#7

Post by anonzzzies »

I would recommend it: it’s a lot nicer than web dev imho. I work a lot with the Ambiq boards and yeah, it’s a pleasure. Having months of battery life and optimising every cycle is fun and shows what we could have. Most embedded devs I work with now are sloppy and lazy and often forget that cutting $0.01 production cost means something if you deploy in a minimum of 10million devices. And actually not needing to recharge the battery or just using less energy for weeks to months is also a massive boon in many projects. I find that type of dev fun to do. Makes me happy.

Re: Ask HN: Transition from Web to Embedded

#8

Post by AlotOfReading »

ChuckNorris89 wrote: post #4
AlotOfReading wrote: post #3

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I feel like a large part of embedded is just telling people to stop counting BOM pennies and buy COTS. It ends up cheaper a shocking majority of the time. I've toyed around with the idea of moving up the stack, but I don't know if pushing protobufs around full-time is any less tedious.

Depends. I've done embedded in high margin products like precision measuring equipment and semiconductors and low margin products like automotive or advertising electronics. Pay and software is mor or less the same, what varies is the amount of bureocracy, documentation and requirements engineering. Getting good pay means you have to find a Fang with high margins on their HW like Apple or Nvidia or go HFT.

I'm not too upset with the pay because I have a nice niche in the FANGoverse. It's mainly the short-sighted muntzing that I find tedious, where tens of millions in development costs are spent to avoid tens of thousands in BOM costs over the product lifetime.

Re: Ask HN: Transition from Web to Embedded

#9

Post by ChuckNorris89 »

AlotOfReading wrote: post #8
ChuckNorris89 wrote: post #4

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Depends. I've done embedded in high margin products like precision measuring equipment and semiconductors and low margin products like automotive or advertising electronics. Pay and software is mor or less the same, what varies is the amount of bureocracy, documentation and requirements engineering. Getting good pay means you have to find a Fang with high margins on their HW like Apple or Nvidia or go HFT.

I'm not too upset with the pay because I have a nice niche in the FANGoverse. It's mainly the short-sighted muntzing that I find tedious, where tens of millions in development costs are spent to avoid tens of thousands in BOM costs over the product lifetime.

>I have a nice niche in the FANGoverse

Can I ask what that niche is?

Re: Ask HN: Transition from Web to Embedded

#10

Post by AlotOfReading »

ChuckNorris89 wrote: post #9
AlotOfReading wrote: post #8

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I'm not too upset with the pay because I have a nice niche in the FANGoverse. It's mainly the short-sighted muntzing that I find tedious, where tens of millions in development costs are spent to avoid tens of thousands in BOM costs over the product lifetime.

>I have a nice niche in the FANGoverse Can I ask what that niche is?

Robotics and custom silicon stuff. I used to do consumer electronics, but that was pretty terrible.
Post reply on HN