There are probably lots of reasons.
For one, monoculture can develop when a culture looks backward in a convergent way, developing "the" story of itself, and deriving lessons and forward-facing stances therefrom. This itself was a strong tradition in Japanese culture for what, over a thousand years? It's still very obviously a valued practice in Japan.
Even the cultural trauma narratives have legend-style stories to them, which is interesting in lots of ways but by definition very closed off in others.
The same traits can be observed in organizational culture in general, for example in high-demand (of their membership) religions and certain businesses.
If you combine this with things like geographic isolation (the island excuse gets thrown around a lot), specific cultural movements, a couple of well-timed typhoons, etc., the additional isolation effect has throughout time been able to seal out new perspectives and recirculate more of the previous ones.
A lot of specific and very beautiful refinements can thrive in these kind of circumstances though, so it's not all bad news.
Just some thoughts.