Live data from Hacker News

Ask HN: Is GitHub still a desirable place to work?

news.ycombinator.com

1–10 of 14 posts

Re: Ask HN: Is GitHub still a desirable place to work?

#3
post #2

Is Github still the type of place that changes your branch names from master to main, (for your own good of course) and bans usage of the word "meritocracy" so as not to hurt people's feelings?

> changes your branch names from master to main

It’s a trivial name change, stay mad.

Re: Ask HN: Is GitHub still a desirable place to work?

#4
post #2

Is Github still the type of place that changes your branch names from master to main, (for your own good of course) and bans usage of the word "meritocracy" so as not to hurt people's feelings?

They didn't change anything retroactively, calm down or host your own git server.

Re: Ask HN: Is GitHub still a desirable place to work?

#5
post #2

Is Github still the type of place that changes your branch names from master to main, (for your own good of course) and bans usage of the word "meritocracy" so as not to hurt people's feelings?

Is America the kind of place that bans slavery and bans usage of the n-word so as not to hurt people's feelings?

Re: Ask HN: Is GitHub still a desirable place to work?

#7
post #5
post #2

Is Github still the type of place that changes your branch names from master to main, (for your own good of course) and bans usage of the word "meritocracy" so as not to hurt people's feelings?

Is America the kind of place that bans slavery and bans usage of the n-word so as not to hurt people's feelings?

That idea is far removed from the debate of a meritocracy vs employment quotas based on ethnicity. Thats the real discussion here.

Re: Ask HN: Is GitHub still a desirable place to work?

#8
post #3
post #2

Is Github still the type of place that changes your branch names from master to main, (for your own good of course) and bans usage of the word "meritocracy" so as not to hurt people's feelings?

> changes your branch names from master to main It’s a trivial name change, stay mad.

>It’s a trivial name change

Tell that to a decade of tooling, training and documentation.

I don't necessarily have a problem with the change, but I wish people would quit telling me it's nothing.

It's not the end of the world or anything, but next time someone who's trying to coast by with the least git knowledge possible (90% of the office) needs help because of this, or is just frustrated that there's another complication they have to remember should I tell them it's "a trivial name change"? I might as well say "it's just a directed acyclic graph of revisions." That's also technically true, but I might as well tell them to go fuck themselves. [1]

[1] http://howfuckedismydatabase.com/nosql/

Re: Ask HN: Is GitHub still a desirable place to work?

#9
post #5
post #2

Is Github still the type of place that changes your branch names from master to main, (for your own good of course) and bans usage of the word "meritocracy" so as not to hurt people's feelings?

Is America the kind of place that bans slavery and bans usage of the n-word so as not to hurt people's feelings?

Yes America and most places have banned slavery.

No it's part of popular music and is protected speech.

Post reply on HN