Ask HN: What were the tech trends thought to be revolutionary but died out?
1–10 of 18 posts
Re: Ask HN: What were the tech trends thought to be revolutionary but died out?
#2Iirc IBM even held an event there and had like an official place.
Cool concept tho.
Re: Ask HN: What were the tech trends thought to be revolutionary but died out?
#3Re: Ask HN: What were the tech trends thought to be revolutionary but died out?
#4Sensors are more important than ever, but they became technological details as opposed to selling points.
Re: Ask HN: What were the tech trends thought to be revolutionary but died out?
#5"parallel computing" has been the next big thing several times since Cray; but it never "died out", it just keeps grinding on the fact that human thoughts are pretty serial, and our computers mostly encode and track with our thinking.
Re: Ask HN: What were the tech trends thought to be revolutionary but died out?
#6Re: Ask HN: What were the tech trends thought to be revolutionary but died out?
#7Re: Ask HN: What were the tech trends thought to be revolutionary but died out?
#8Virtual reality in 1987, 1992, 1998?, 2005, 2015 ... "parallel computing" has been the next big thing several times since Cray; but it never "died out", it just keeps grinding on the fact that human thoughts are pretty serial, and our computers mostly encode and track with our thinking.
As far as practical applications --- the set is vastly smaller, especially where there's a human in the REPL loop.
Re: Ask HN: What were the tech trends thought to be revolutionary but died out?
#9"Hot technologies of " should be a good keyword for search.
Re: Ask HN: What were the tech trends thought to be revolutionary but died out?
#10This was mobile code on a scale that is currently impossible. Once we get capability based security that protects the hardware and our data from things we run by default, it's possible it'll make a comeback, and there will be another wild explosion of creativity in programming.