Live data from Hacker News

Ask HN: Is the omission of politics a political stance?

news.ycombinator.com

1–10 of 15 posts

Ask HN: Is the omission of politics a political stance?

#1
When posting to HN it states posts must be on-topic and exclude things such as

"Most stories about politics, or crime, or sports, unless they're evidence of some interesting new phenomenon"

I truly do enjoy the content and community here on HN, but my question is that given the current political climate isn't the decision to omit political content a political stance rather than an apolitical one?

Re: Ask HN: Is the omission of politics a political stance?

#3
My preference is to see political stories here only if they're related to technology or tech companies. That seems to be the line mods are straddling now, as far as I can tell.

For pure political stories, there are a million other places to discuss those, and honestly some really disturbing opinions (e.g. eugenics) come out of the woodwork here on those types of stories.

Re: Ask HN: Is the omission of politics a political stance?

#5
post #3

My preference is to see political stories here only if they're related to technology or tech companies. That seems to be the line mods are straddling now, as far as I can tell. For pure political stories, there are a million other places to discuss those, and honestly some really disturbing opinions (e.g. eugenics) come out of the woodwork here on those types of stories.

[deleted]

Re: Ask HN: Is the omission of politics a political stance?

#7
I don't mind it so long as the political discussion is localized to political stories, and so long as those stories are the minority of content on HN. Generally speaking, the political discussion here is better than on reddit, but I only want to engage with it when I seek it out. What's frustrating is when political discussion creeps into totally unrelated threads.

Re: Ask HN: Is the omission of politics a political stance?

#8
I'll put it this way: I'd like to see thoughtful discussions of the flaws of MCAS and what incentives led the Federal Aviation Authority to approve the 737 MAX. I am not interested in discussions of good pilots vs bad pilots.

If we think problems are systemic or structural, then lets talk systems and structures.

Re: Ask HN: Is the omission of politics a political stance?

#10
To the main question, I think the answer is yes, although that's only something I've recently come around to.

To strike a metaphor, is ignoring or not participating in religion a 'religious stance'? It depends on your frame of reference. To someone who is religious, yes. To someone unaware or ignorant of religion, no.

So, why is ignoring or not participating in politics a political stance? Because unlike with religion, we have no choice to live outside of the systems which politics govern. You are affected by the politics of your country and your community even if you are unaware or ignorant of them, therefore the frame of reference is within a political system and a lack of politics is a political stance. Purely IMHO, of course.

Post reply on HN