I turned the "showdead" feature ON and now I see many posts with the [dead] marker. Some of them are interesting and I'm tempted to click "vouch" on some of them. If I do this too often, won't it hurt the reputation of my account somehow? I mean, am I allowed/supposed to do this frequently or this "vouching" feature is for emergency only?
Ask HN: Is it OK to vouch for many posts?
1–10 of 10 posts
Re: Ask HN: Is it OK to vouch for many posts?
#2https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=10298512 Maybe that will answer your question. But just exercise common judgment, think of a possible reason as to why a particular thing was flagged [dead] to begin with, and then determine if it's unfair.
Re: Ask HN: Is it OK to vouch for many posts?
#3https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=10298512 Maybe that will answer your question. But just exercise common judgment, think of a possible reason as to why a particular thing was flagged [dead] to begin with, and then determine if it's unfair.
I'm trying to understand the intent of this feature. Is it an invitation to help HN to decide who is posting good content and who is not, and we are supposed to vouch frequently. Or, it is only for some corner cases and we should not touch it too often.
Re: Ask HN: Is it OK to vouch for many posts?
#4https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=10298512 Maybe that will answer your question. But just exercise common judgment, think of a possible reason as to why a particular thing was flagged [dead] to begin with, and then determine if it's unfair.
I'm trying to understand the intent of this feature. Is it an invitation to help HN to decide who is posting good content and who is not, and we are supposed to vouch frequently. Or, it is only for some corner cases and we should not touch it too often.
So its basically community moderation and you should "Only rescue civil, substantive contributions to the site". In a sense, I think its something you only do as a special-type thing, but one vouch on a post won't rescue it (there need to be multiple vouches if I understand it correctly)...so vouch if you want to, but make sure you're doing it for the right reasons.
Re: Ask HN: Is it OK to vouch for many posts?
#5Earlier quoted context omitted.
I'm trying to understand the intent of this feature. Is it an invitation to help HN to decide who is posting good content and who is not, and we are supposed to vouch frequently. Or, it is only for some corner cases and we should not touch it too often.
So its basically community moderation and you should "Only rescue civil, substantive contributions to the site". In a sense, I think its something you only do as a special-type thing, but one vouch on a post won't rescue it (there need to be multiple vouches if I understand it correctly)...so vouch if you want to, but make sure you're doing it for the right reasons.
> but one vouch on a post won't rescue it
I've been able to consistently save dead comments with a single vouch, so I presume it only takes one, at least for some level of HN user.
Re: Ask HN: Is it OK to vouch for many posts?
#6Earlier quoted context omitted.
So its basically community moderation and you should "Only rescue civil, substantive contributions to the site". In a sense, I think its something you only do as a special-type thing, but one vouch on a post won't rescue it (there need to be multiple vouches if I understand it correctly)...so vouch if you want to, but make sure you're doing it for the right reasons.
> but one vouch on a post won't rescue it I've been able to consistently save dead comments with a single vouch, so I presume it only takes one, at least for some level of HN user.
Yes, same here. Just one "vouch" rescues a post.
Re: Ask HN: Is it OK to vouch for many posts?
#7Earlier quoted context omitted.
So its basically community moderation and you should "Only rescue civil, substantive contributions to the site". In a sense, I think its something you only do as a special-type thing, but one vouch on a post won't rescue it (there need to be multiple vouches if I understand it correctly)...so vouch if you want to, but make sure you're doing it for the right reasons.
> but one vouch on a post won't rescue it I've been able to consistently save dead comments with a single vouch, so I presume it only takes one, at least for some level of HN user.
Same.
FWIW, I've always treated the "vouch" feature as something to be used fairly infrequently, for somewhat exceptional cases. I don't know if that's actually the intent or not, but it "feels" like the kind of thing one shouldn't be doing all the time. shrug
Re: Ask HN: Is it OK to vouch for many posts?
#8I usually have a higher bar for vouching. It has to be more than something that wouldn’t be flagged if that makes sense. Mainly because I don’t what my rep to get a hit. Something I think is ok might be a bad comment in the quantum HN mind.
Re: Ask HN: Is it OK to vouch for many posts?
#9You could always email the webmasters (see the contact link at the bottom of the page) and ask them if your vouching usage fits the intended use of the feature.
Re: Ask HN: Is it OK to vouch for many posts?
#10Vouch early and vouch often.