Ask HN: What is the dark side of working at a successful startup?
1–10 of 166 posts
Re: Ask HN: What is the dark side of working at a successful startup?
#2Re: Ask HN: What is the dark side of working at a successful startup?
#3Re: Ask HN: What is the dark side of working at a successful startup?
#4Re: Ask HN: What is the dark side of working at a successful startup?
#5If you're asking HN, does that mean you feel something bad in your gut? If so, just talk to people who hired you or reach out to existing employees and try to get your questions answered. They'll help a lot more than people on HN who aren't familiar with your exact situation.
Re: Ask HN: What is the dark side of working at a successful startup?
#6Re: Ask HN: What is the dark side of working at a successful startup?
#7The dark side is probably the equity - how to actually cash out on that. For example, employees at Gilt were expecting an IPO and then eventually it got acquired by another company and devalued their stock, yet they paid taxes on the earlier value of it, and ended up losing money.
Re: Ask HN: What is the dark side of working at a successful startup?
#8That bias can make it hard to change things, even clearly broken things. It can make it hard to introduce new products, since anything new will be tiny compared to the old successful product. It can make it hard to get rid of bad managers, since their bottom line looks great.
For a view from inside this phenomenon, read http://www.paulgraham.com/yahoo.html
Re: Ask HN: What is the dark side of working at a successful startup?
#9The dark side is probably the equity - how to actually cash out on that. For example, employees at Gilt were expecting an IPO and then eventually it got acquired by another company and devalued their stock, yet they paid taxes on the earlier value of it, and ended up losing money.
Re: Ask HN: What is the dark side of working at a successful startup?
#10company wide meetings about arbitrary things that don't matter (ie. 2 people reply to the company account on twitter and suddenly EVERYONE has to get involved)
pretending someone's use (or lack thereof) of their unlimited vacation matters, because it won't after the exit or buyout or shutdown