Ask HN: What interesting thought did you read on HN but couldn't find later?
1–10 of 232 posts
Re: Ask HN: What interesting thought did you read on HN but couldn't find later?
#2Re: Ask HN: What interesting thought did you read on HN but couldn't find later?
#3Re: Ask HN: What interesting thought did you read on HN but couldn't find later?
#4There was a comment about the theory, that emotions are not represented in the body but actually happen there. And we learn to interpret the bodily state as having an emotion. Can't find it.
An excerpt can be found here: https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/gut-feelings-the-...
Re: Ask HN: What interesting thought did you read on HN but couldn't find later?
#5There was a comment about the theory, that emotions are not represented in the body but actually happen there. And we learn to interpret the bodily state as having an emotion. Can't find it.
There's some really interesting literature about this topic, I only discovered it recently. I'd recommend starting with 'The Good Gut' by Justin Sonnenburg. An excerpt can be found here: https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/gut-feelings-the-...
I recently found the theory of Lynn Margulis interesting, that we are all holobionts, not just relying on symbiotic bacteria but critically dependent on them, for breaking down food just as well as for staying healty. In that sense, we are less individuals and more landscapes, gardens that foster life.
Re: Ask HN: What interesting thought did you read on HN but couldn't find later?
#6Somebody was writing about a concept of negotiations that focuses on values of the other party, and asking the question "what if your value is met" instead of arguing for your positions. The example was about gun control: "what if there's no crime, would you be willing to give up guns?"
http://slatestarcodex.com/2018/05/08/varieties-of-argumentat...
In the context of negotiation, the book Getting To Yes describes a similar concept:
Re: Ask HN: What interesting thought did you read on HN but couldn't find later?
#7Re: Ask HN: What interesting thought did you read on HN but couldn't find later?
#8There was a comment about the theory, that emotions are not represented in the body but actually happen there. And we learn to interpret the bodily state as having an emotion. Can't find it.
"The James–Lange theory refers to a hypothesis on the origin and nature of emotions and is one of the earliest theories of emotion within modern psychology. It was developed independently by two 19th-century scholars, William James and Carl Lange. The basic premise of the theory is that physiological arousal instigates the experience of emotion. Instead of feeling an emotion and subsequent physiological (bodily) response, the theory proposes that the physiological change is primary, and emotion is then experienced when the brain reacts to the information received via the body's nervous system." — https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/James%E2%80%93Lange_theory
Re: Ask HN: What interesting thought did you read on HN but couldn't find later?
#9There was a comment about the theory, that emotions are not represented in the body but actually happen there. And we learn to interpret the bodily state as having an emotion. Can't find it.
Re: Ask HN: What interesting thought did you read on HN but couldn't find later?
#10There was a comment about the theory, that emotions are not represented in the body but actually happen there. And we learn to interpret the bodily state as having an emotion. Can't find it.