1–10 of 10 posts
Both offer similar technical challenges, problems to solve, etc. Both have similar compensation.
Thoughts?
If you can handle the risk and stress, the CTO job will likely be more rewarding.
That said, it's absolutely critical to find a mentor outside of the company to lean on. It's likely that your peers will know nothing about running engineering teams, and having an experienced voice of reason can make-or-break your experience.
If the startup is loosing money, no matter how small. You would be under a titanic amounts of stress. Though I can't really judge the future potential of the startup based on the information you have provided. I'd say stay put. Use the spare energy and sanity to work on your own side projects.
>>nearly-profitable pre-Series-A SaaS startup If the startup is loosing money, no matter how small. You would be under a titanic amounts of stress. Though I can't really judge the future potential of the startup based on the information you have provided. I'd say stay put. Use the spare energy and sanity to work on your own side projects.
I did the reverse; started as a Head of Engineering at a startup, then moved into Engineering Lead/Manager roles. It was risky (we ended up getting shut down) and extremely stressful (I was involved in a dozen fires at any given time), but I learned an incredible amount. If you can handle the risk and stress, the CTO job will likely be more rewarding. That said, it's absolutely critical to find a mentor outside of th…
I'm an experienced manager, but this is still a hugely important point. Mentor relationships are really underrated.
Do it, take the startup job. No downside. If it all goes tits up you will now have lead technology operations on your resume so your next corporate job will be a jump up.
$150B must be coming with more BS but more benefits.
If you are in a mood to relax, ofc $150B company.
If you want total control, $10M sounds more fun.