I have been wondering with the discussion around SO culture and community if maybe this is important. For all the discussion about "good" questions and wanting to archive generally applicable programming advice, would it change the assumptions about the value of either if it turns out that people aren't reading the questions anyway?
Ask HN: Anyone else not read the questions on SO, only the answers when stuck?
1–10 of 14 posts
Re: Ask HN: Anyone else not read the questions on SO, only the answers when stuck?
#2Re: Ask HN: Anyone else not read the questions on SO, only the answers when stuck?
#3Re: Ask HN: Anyone else not read the questions on SO, only the answers when stuck?
#4Re: Ask HN: Anyone else not read the questions on SO, only the answers when stuck?
#5Re: Ask HN: Anyone else not read the questions on SO, only the answers when stuck?
#6Also noticed that my gold badge questions (the ones with really high views) weren't getting a lot of upvotes too. Once a question is prominent enough on Google, people just read the answer.
Re: Ask HN: Anyone else not read the questions on SO, only the answers when stuck?
#7I also read the comments on the question and most of the answers to the bottom, so I just read more than most people. I have the gold badge for voting on 600 questions, which only 0.4% of users have. I'm just too curious for my own good.
Re: Ask HN: Anyone else not read the questions on SO, only the answers when stuck?
#8Re: Ask HN: Anyone else not read the questions on SO, only the answers when stuck?
#9Re: Ask HN: Anyone else not read the questions on SO, only the answers when stuck?
#10I don't do this at all. More than half of the questions that seem relevant from Google actually aren't my situation -- no point reading the answers. Also, there are lots of good questions that list things I should have tried. I also read the comments on the question and most of the answers to the bottom, so I just read more than most people. I have the gold badge for voting on 600 questions, which only 0.4% of users…