Ask HN: Are there any studies about book reading retention rates vs. audiobooks?
1–10 of 63 posts
Re: Ask HN: Are there any studies about book reading retention rates vs. audiobooks?
#2Re: Ask HN: Are there any studies about book reading retention rates vs. audiobooks?
#3But if it's something that's new to me, or highly technical, I'll follow up with a course, physical book, or create a study out of it in a different manner.
Re: Ask HN: Are there any studies about book reading retention rates vs. audiobooks?
#4If I really want to study a subject I will listen to the audiobook, and then re-read it in text form.
Re: Ask HN: Are there any studies about book reading retention rates vs. audiobooks?
#5There have been studies looking at the relative retention rates of visual vs auditory stimuli where the visual typically comes out ahead:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2667065/ https://scholarworks.iu.edu/journals/index.php/iusburj/artic... http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal....
However, I would posit that the main reason for this discrepancy is that memory is linked to the level of stimulation, and we typically have developed to place a far higher weighting on our visual systems, not to mention the fact that the visual signal typically has a far higher information content, linking to many existing mental structures.
Once these sort of links are removed, with the stimuli being decontextualized, the two tend to be more similar: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/BF00447078
The problem with audiobooks vs reading is far more constrained, and possibly environmentally determined.
One study found that visual vs auditory retention rates for a short block of text were virtually identical: http://psycnet.apa.org/record/1978-21860-001
But another again shows the superiority of the visual system: http://scholar.utc.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1171&cont...
But this was done in a controlled environment where the subjects' full attention was focused on the audio. In such a case, it makes sense that retention rates would be comparable, as the same language centers in the brain are used for processing the input once it is transferred from the appropriate input sense.
The big problem with audiobook retention is that we typically listen to them whilst being involved in other tasks, and there are are a myriad of studies showing that humans are inherently extremely bad multi-taskers, with high task-switching costs even in people who claim to be otherwise.
Aside from just sitting with my eyes closed and listening, I find that retention is maximized with audiobooks when there is a split between System 1 and System 2 activity (ala Thinking, Fast and Slow by Daniel Kahneman). If I am doing something like driving, using System 1, my System 2 can be fully focused on the audiobook, until something darts out in the middle of the road and then I end up having to rewind and re-listen to what I missed.
Re: Ask HN: Are there any studies about book reading retention rates vs. audiobooks?
#6I've found that I retain a lot more of the details now that I'm listening through the books and I cannot just skim past "the boring parts". I notice the subtle callbacks to details in earlier stories. I notice the little hints or clues dropped by the author (especially in their choice of words). I think I actually enjoy this more because I get a stronger sense of the "craftsmanship" element.
However, this really requires a good reading so that you can distinguish the different voices, emotions, and details.
Re: Ask HN: Are there any studies about book reading retention rates vs. audiobooks?
#7That said, I find it valuable to learn how a writer thinks more so than the technical details of each point they're trying to make. Right now I'm on a deep dive for an author...listening to ~100 hours of their material. It is somewhat like listening to 100 hours of their lecture. I learn different things while listening to a lecture than I do when reading.
Re: Ask HN: Are there any studies about book reading retention rates vs. audiobooks?
#8http://www.danielwillingham.com/daniel-willingham-science-an...
The human brain is hardware-accelerated for encoding and decoding spoken language. That's why alphabets often just represent sounds, why it's so easy for even an educated adult to right homophones, and why professional writers still take into consideration sonic properties like rhythm. It's because, like the article says, even while reading silently, you still hear it.
Speech is primary, writing secondary. So sit back, relax, and enjoy it.
Re: Ask HN: Are there any studies about book reading retention rates vs. audiobooks?
#9I will stick with my paperback books for retention.