Ask HN: Is there any reason to use Comodo SSL instead of Let's Encrypt?
1–4 of 4 posts
Re: Ask HN: Is there any reason to use Comodo SSL instead of Let's Encrypt?
#2Re: Ask HN: Is there any reason to use Comodo SSL instead of Let's Encrypt?
#3Wildcard certificates.
Also they are not as important with Let's Encrypt given that you can dynamically and instantly provision a certificate for a subdomain.
Without Let's Encrypt getting a certificate for each domain was costly and time consuming. Let's Encrypt solves both problems without using wildcard certificates.
Re: Ask HN: Is there any reason to use Comodo SSL instead of Let's Encrypt?
#4Google is showing results because of the keyword ‘worse’. There is no direct mean of that.
Secondly, Comodo SSL Certificate is of course a good choice over let’s encrypt. You can get Let’s Encrypt SSL for free for 90 days. Comodo also offers free trial SSL for 90 days. If you want a paid SSL for a year, Comodo has a better solution as PositiveSSL ($7.45yr) with multiple feature which you’ll not have with any other free SSL Certificate.
Price reference https://comodosslstore.com/positivessl.aspx