Live data from Hacker News

Ask HN: How would you fix cities?

news.ycombinator.com

1–10 of 47 posts

Re: Ask HN: How would you fix cities?

#2
That's not easy.

Take public transit, for instance. Arguably, that would be a good thing to change - supply fast, frequent, convenient public transit. But how would you do it?

US cities (with few exceptions) have reached a stable equilibrium where cars are necessary because there's no convenient transit, there's no transit because the city doesn't have the density to make it worthwhile, and it can't have the density because there has to be parking for everybody's cars. How do you change that? You have to change all three pieces at once (plus peoples' attitudes). You almost have to start over with a new city.

Re: Ask HN: How would you fix cities?

#3
I was amazed when I heard that Copenhagen had a government department focused on Quality of Life. And that the bike culture of Denmark was created when they decided that cars were harming their quality of life (it was a 30 year project.) And Finland decided to focus their University on improving life - rather than just generic research. Considering those examples, I would say that cities need to reflect the needs and desires of their citizens - as opposed to the business leaders, the rich, and their politicians.

Re: Ask HN: How would you fix cities?

#5
Put a limit (e.g. 1) on the number of residential properties any individual person can own within city limits and make them (residential properties only within city limits) illegal to buy for a corporation.

A lot of people might think 'socialist' and I may have said the same a few years ago but having seen issues up front, lives (within some cities) are being completely ruined with the hoarding and speculation.

Re: Ask HN: How would you fix cities?

#6
What do you mean by "run more efficiently"?

Just focusing on space efficiency: very dense cities could build an underground transportation system connecting people's homes directly to space-efficient, centralized facilities. Instead of having a kitchen, you would order food or freshly-prepared ingredients to combine yourself. Instead of doing laundry by hand, you would send it to a centralized laundry facility, which would clean it for you and send it back. Trash would be disposed of using the same system. You could also use this system to store and retrieve things you use infrequently, so they don't have to take up space in your home.

A system like this would enable higher density by reducing the number of facilities you need in and adjacent to your home. It would free up road space by focusing commercial traffic on these centralized facilities instead of distributing it throughout the city. And it would free up road-side space by lowering the demand for laundromats, supermarkets, and so on.

Re: Ask HN: How would you fix cities?

#7
On a heavily-used block with tall buildings on both sides, here's a recipe that will work well:

1. Dig up the street and sidewalks, going down 60-100 feet.

2. At the bottom of this pit, drive in piles if you haven't yet hit bedrock.

3. Build a box, about twenty feet high, to run plumbing, power internet, and other utilities

4. On top of that box, build another one for a train.

5. On top of that box, build another one for vehicles to pass through. Because we're aiming for the future, we can assume that the vehicles in this box will be purely electric, and won't need the kind of ventilation that most of today's vehicles do.

6. On top of that box, build a basement, perhaps with alleyway access on both sides (these should be narrow - no wider than approximately 15 feet.)

7. Now we're on the street level, above ground - a building should rise up minimally two to four stories from here. On both sides, narrow streets should be constructed, reserved only for foot traffic. Shops, bars and restaurants of varying sizes should line both sides of the street.

8. Install vibration and light sensors inside each partition wall in the new buildings, as well as in the existing buildings that line the street. Establish a legal framework allows anyone to use the spaces inside each building for any purpose, so long as both parties on either side of each wall and floor agree to specified limits (with the existing owner's terms taking precedence over that of the newcomer - note that there is give and take here, as a space in which you can't make any noise or let any light leak out isn't worth much compared to one in which you can.) With this in place, inflexible one-size-fits-all zoning restrictions are no longer needed.

This arrangement can be implemented slowly, on a block-by-block basis, to transform any any every pedestrian-unfriendly American city into a vibrant urban paradise for people like me that seek this.

Re: Ask HN: How would you fix cities?

#9

That's not easy. Take public transit, for instance. Arguably, that would be a good thing to change - supply fast, frequent, convenient public transit. But how would you do it? US cities (with few exceptions) have reached a stable equilibrium where cars are necessary because there's no convenient transit, there's no transit because the city doesn't have the density to make it worthwhile, and it can't have the density…

Of course the U.S. has the chicken-and-egg problem, but public transit is my vote if I could wave a magic wand. I am tired of car cities: more pollution, obesity, rage, and sprawl.

Re: Ask HN: How would you fix cities?

#10

On a heavily-used block with tall buildings on both sides, here's a recipe that will work well: 1. Dig up the street and sidewalks, going down 60-100 feet. 2. At the bottom of this pit, drive in piles if you haven't yet hit bedrock. 3. Build a box, about twenty feet high, to run plumbing, power internet, and other utilities 4. On top of that box, build another one for a train. 5. On top of that box, build another one…

It also leaves you a one-block-long tunnel for a train, and another for a road, for years until you get the blocks around it done - probably for decades until you get a system that goes anywhere.
Post reply on HN