Ask HN: Bootstrapping with 2 founders
1–7 of 7 posts
Re: Ask HN: Bootstrapping with 2 founders
#2Re: Ask HN: Bootstrapping with 2 founders
#3Also decide who makes final decisions, since you have equal votes. Decisions should never be made by committee, even if the committee is only 2 people.
Re: Ask HN: Bootstrapping with 2 founders
#4Hire an experienced startup lawyer. I can't stress that enough. I actually think a C Corp is a huge problem related to taxes and that you need to switch to LLC, but I'm not a lawyer or accountant. Also decide who makes final decisions, since you have equal votes. Decisions should never be made by committee, even if the committee is only 2 people.
Re: Ask HN: Bootstrapping with 2 founders
#5Hire an experienced startup lawyer. I can't stress that enough. I actually think a C Corp is a huge problem related to taxes and that you need to switch to LLC, but I'm not a lawyer or accountant. Also decide who makes final decisions, since you have equal votes. Decisions should never be made by committee, even if the committee is only 2 people.
Why do you oppose decisions by committee?
For a startup, losing time is death. You're often choosing between option A and option B, and neither will kill the company, but you end up arguing about it forever. If one single person doesn't have the authority to say, "We've argued enough, and now we're doing A," then you'll lose valuable time and die.
Re: Ask HN: Bootstrapping with 2 founders
#6y agree with smt88, C corp is prob. overkill and could introduce tax issues go LLC first.
I would just have each of you track what you invest as expenses for the LLC, then get reimbursed once you are profitable and keep your 50/50 ownership split.
The two of you should be able to make decisions together, I expect one of you are handling marketing and one technical anyway so you can probably defer decisions in those areas to each other.
Good luck.
Re: Ask HN: Bootstrapping with 2 founders
#7Earlier quoted context omitted.
Why do you oppose decisions by committee?
"A camel is a horse designed by committee" is a popular cliche, and it's true. Committees are a mixture of visions, and you often get the worst of both worlds. For a startup, losing time is death. You're often choosing between option A and option B, and neither will kill the company, but you end up arguing about it forever. If one single person doesn't have the authority to say, "We've argued enough, and now we're do…
Committee gives you a perspective from different people. Which is valuable! Have the meetings if and only if you or them have to go outside the delegated authority to find a solution.