Earlier quoted context omitted.
Cool. You make reference to fonts. I assume this isn't font in the traditional sense, ie the look (feel?) of a character.
Nope, I actually do refer to fonts as you know them. Long story short, prior to linux kernel 4.19 and brltty 6.0, only those characters that are mapped to a glyph in the currently loaded console font can be backtranslated to the actual codepoint. So to be able to read unicode braille (0x2800-0x28FF) I needed to load a braille font in addition to the standard latin glyph. This dependency on the loaded font has been re…
I assume its for differing reasons? You would want an X to always be an X and what feels most like an X to you, and not be worried about whether the X is Ariel or Times New Roman.
Does it extend further to do italics and such?
I had naively thought the screen would do all the heavy lifting in this situation, feed it text, and it converts it to braille.