It's a great reminder of how good this feature is that we take for granted. I think this outage has actually improved my appreciation for Gmail (a service I normally only complain about).
Seriously. I didn't even realize this was a wide issue, but I couldn't find a school enrolment email I was looking for this morning, and found it in the spam folder. The fact that I basically never have to do this is actually amazing.
Ask HN: Gmail spam filtering suddenly marking everything as spam?
91–100 of 131 posts
Re: Ask HN: Gmail spam filtering suddenly marking everything as spam?
#92Any ideas on how to deal with stopping spam emails in general, scripts/tools etc?
Step zero. Never disclose your email address to anyone. This is very easy and straightforward. I operate 6 Gmail accounts, and three are "alts" where I've basically never given the address out to anyone at all, and they receive zero spam, zero UCE, zero marketing emails. Of course, on my "main" I've disclosed the address to many entities and I use it for sign-in and shipping and many things. And yes, I do receive spa…
After a few years of updating addresses that I’d missed whenever something showed up that was forwarded from my old gmail account, I shut down my old account.
No more spam, whenever I start receiving spam to a Hide My Email address, I deactivate it.
Re: Ask HN: Gmail spam filtering suddenly marking everything as spam?
#93Earlier quoted context omitted.
Well, spam is no big deal, and any scam that comes via email should not affect anyone who is educated and prepared for them. Of course, with a well-known email address, you could run a higher risk of credential stuffing, and an account takeover by someone who hijacks your email account, and then pivots from there to taking other accounts. But this seems to be a risk we all take: email addresses are meant to be shared…
Spammers, if minorly sophisticated, can strip those identifiers, so wildcard mail acceptance on servicename@customdomain.com takes the crown if you’re setting this up fresh!
Re: Ask HN: Gmail spam filtering suddenly marking everything as spam?
#94Earlier quoted context omitted.
Multiple accounts as others have said. The most powerful is to switch to a provider that permits custom domains and allows you to construct topic specific wildcard addresses on the fly. These can't be flagged as invalid or stripped like Google '+' suffixes and when compromised, you can filter them into oblivion and move on to something else. You also get the bonus of having the entire namespace to yourself and can se…
Which service provider would you recommend?
Re: Ask HN: Gmail spam filtering suddenly marking everything as spam?
#95Earlier quoted context omitted.
Yeah i have fantasies of having my own email server and stuff but the spam detection is probably the 3rd thing that would have me crawling back
I have run my own mail server for years and I rarely see spam. I'm running a classic Bayesian filter as outlined in the legendary PG post "A Plan For Spam" and it works very well. I don't really get all the fuss about this issue. When I do see a piece of unclassified spam I simply classify it and continue. For me this is a far better tradeoff than having all my most private mail on some bigcorp server where any nerd…
You've functionally given yourself very little extra privacy because the vast majority of emails you send or receive will still cross through BigCorp servers (whether Google, Microsoft, Intuit, or other).
You can do the work to run your own mail server, but so few other people do that one end of the conversation is still almost always feeding a corporation's data lake.
Re: Ask HN: Gmail spam filtering suddenly marking everything as spam?
#96Earlier quoted context omitted.
You can tell from your subject lines. You cannot 100% tell from others’ subject lines, if you don’t know them personally.
Yes but I also don't have the ability to know what millions of accounts are receiving, unlike Google.
It’s past patterns + live human weighting.
Re: Ask HN: Gmail spam filtering suddenly marking everything as spam?
#97Earlier quoted context omitted.
ORLY? * Are you available? * Paul, can we have a zoom meeting with you on Monday? * Assistance for donation * Greetings!!! * some ideas for you * Refund request * Somethings not working * Manuel Montoya for roof work contractor * proposals for print * Invite Connection Half of the above are actual spam, half are not. Tell me which is which ...
I agree with you but for the love of the game, these are the ones I'm guessing are spam: * Paul, can we have a zoom meeting with you on Monday? * Assistance for donation * Greetings!!! * Invite Connection * Refund request
Re: Ask HN: Gmail spam filtering suddenly marking everything as spam?
#98Re: Ask HN: Gmail spam filtering suddenly marking everything as spam?
#99Earlier quoted context omitted.
I have run my own mail server for years and I rarely see spam. I'm running a classic Bayesian filter as outlined in the legendary PG post "A Plan For Spam" and it works very well. I don't really get all the fuss about this issue. When I do see a piece of unclassified spam I simply classify it and continue. For me this is a far better tradeoff than having all my most private mail on some bigcorp server where any nerd…
> For me this is a far better tradeoff than having all my most private mail on some bigcorp server where any nerd can rifle through it. You've functionally given yourself very little extra privacy because the vast majority of emails you send or receive will still cross through BigCorp servers (whether Google, Microsoft, Intuit, or other). You can do the work to run your own mail server, but so few other people do tha…
Re: Ask HN: Gmail spam filtering suddenly marking everything as spam?
#100It's a great reminder of how good this feature is that we take for granted. I think this outage has actually improved my appreciation for Gmail (a service I normally only complain about).
Seriously. I didn't even realize this was a wide issue, but I couldn't find a school enrolment email I was looking for this morning, and found it in the spam folder. The fact that I basically never have to do this is actually amazing.
With that much data, even a simple Bayesian classifier should work pretty much perfectly.