Live data from Hacker News

Ask HN: Cheap dedicated hosting options for side projects

news.ycombinator.com

91–100 of 122 posts

Re: Ask HN: Cheap dedicated hosting options for side projects

#91

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Fyi, you might want to check this out (scroll to the bottom and start with the first post): https://amc.ovh/

exactly what i needed.

I can +1 that. It's definitely not an A->B->C, but it's enough to get you 95% of the way there.

Re: Ask HN: Cheap dedicated hosting options for side projects

#93
I use OVH. Kimsufi is basically the same company. I think it is their low end alias or white label.

I think Kimsufi limits you to 100Mbps which might not be enough bandwidth speed if you plan on server video or other large files to a bunch of people at once. OVH gives you a 1 Gbps unlimited pipe included.

https://www.ovh.com/us/dedicated-servers/storage/

Re: Ask HN: Cheap dedicated hosting options for side projects

#94
Kimsufi's problem is the lack of redundancy, if the single drive on a box dies then you're not going to see your data again.

However, given the low price you could rent them in pairs and replicate the data using something like DRBD. Depending on your comfort level, this can be a very viable and cost effective option, or a system administration nightmare. If it's the latter, then definitely look into an object storage solution if your applications are compatible with that.

By the way, I've written an ebook which tries to help people make sense of the various hosting options available on the market today, perhaps it can be useful to you. The book site is

https://www.hostingforappdevelopers.com

Re: Ask HN: Cheap dedicated hosting options for side projects

#95

Kimsufi's problem is the lack of redundancy, if the single drive on a box dies then you're not going to see your data again. However, given the low price you could rent them in pairs and replicate the data using something like DRBD. Depending on your comfort level, this can be a very viable and cost effective option, or a system administration nightmare. If it's the latter, then definitely look into an object storage…

Mine are mainly experimental apps, so the data redundancy is not really that important, but yes, at some point in time, if the need arises, I can get another box like you said, and may be just rsync everything via a daily cron job or something I suppose.

Re: Ask HN: Cheap dedicated hosting options for side projects

#96

FYI, DigitalOcean is rolling out expandable block storage summer 2016 (so any day now), so that might be a good way to go. Not a lot of information, but keep an eye on https://www.digitalocean.com/features/storage/ . You may be able to ask support to manually add you to the beta if you need it right now . DigitalOcean is really good about going out of their way to win your business. Full disclosure: I have no relatio…

+1 on DigitalOcean with Block Storage. Currently using DO with Amazon S3 mounted using /etc/fstab via S3FS https://github.com/s3fs-fuse/s3fs-fuse (which has eventual consistency but if you want cheap)

Re: Ask HN: Cheap dedicated hosting options for side projects

#97
post #16

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Thanks. S3 would work fine for me (from a tech perspective), but the question is, would it offer ~500 GB storage for under $10/mo?

According to their calculator[1], it's $15. Less than $10 seems unreasonably low for what you're asking. [1] https://aws.amazon.com/s3/pricing/

You can use S3FS (https://github.com/s3fs-fuse/s3fs-fuse) to mount your buckets and make it look like just another directory using /etc/fstab

Re: Ask HN: Cheap dedicated hosting options for side projects

#98

At https://MNX.io we introduced an SSD cached storage VPS server -- 500GB starting at $7/month, available up to 40TB at $15/TB.

I remember when you guys were first starting out :) I think we emailed back and forth. Nice to see you guys are here!
Post reply on HN