Ask HN: What's the worst piece of software you use everyday?
881–890 of 1001 posts
Re: Ask HN: What's the worst piece of software you use everyday?
#882Anything Atlasssian. Jira, Bitbucket, confluence. Just frustrating to use, poor UX, and slow. Business types love them however. AWS. It’s UI is honestly baffling, it feels and looks like someone made it in a rush with jQuery and Bootstrap years ago. It’s login and identity and resource management is confusing, and apparently you need a chrome extension which adds a bunch of complicated options I don’t really understa…
I could not disagree more with Atlassian. They are among the best software i have ever used. Especially bitbucket is superb. Confluence is by far the best wiki I have ever used. Jira is 10x better than any alternative I'm aware of.
Re: Ask HN: What's the worst piece of software you use everyday?
#883Re: Ask HN: What's the worst piece of software you use everyday?
#884Re: Ask HN: What's the worst piece of software you use everyday?
#885I hate to say it, but Signal. Signal has consistently been a pain to use for my moderately sized ( Messages sometimes don't arrive or arrive out of ordered and appear in the wrong order, scrolling up has random jumping behavior, opening the chat in iOS causes my audio to stop playing, there is explicitly no way to back up any of the chat, copying multiple messages is broken on desktop, search is super slow and search…
Unfortunately, I’ve encountered many of the same issues, so I would recommend trying either Session (fork of Signal) [1] or Telegram (less secure but supports bots) [2] [1] https://getsession.org/ [2] https://telegram.org/
Re: Ask HN: What's the worst piece of software you use everyday?
#886Re: Ask HN: What's the worst piece of software you use everyday?
#887Re: Ask HN: What's the worst piece of software you use everyday?
#888Re: Ask HN: What's the worst piece of software you use everyday?
#889Re: Ask HN: What's the worst piece of software you use everyday?
#890Anything Atlasssian. Jira, Bitbucket, confluence. Just frustrating to use, poor UX, and slow. Business types love them however. AWS. It’s UI is honestly baffling, it feels and looks like someone made it in a rush with jQuery and Bootstrap years ago. It’s login and identity and resource management is confusing, and apparently you need a chrome extension which adds a bunch of complicated options I don’t really understa…
> AWS... It is literally years behind Azure. I’m going to have to disagree with you here, AWS has some quirks, but the UI is being actively worked on and improved but Azure is an outright dumpster fire. Who thought scrolling sideways was a great idea? Why does the x close _everything_ and take you back to the dashboard and not just close the current pane? Why is everything about permissions and auth so hard to find?
Well, at least if it did that /consistently/ it would be an improved. It sometimes just closes the current pane as expected.
More generally speaking, to me Azure feels very jarring. There are panes that are logically pretty much the same but have wildly different behaviours (I'm thinking of AzureAD 'subpanes', some of which take over and there's no way of going back to the main AzureAD pane even by scrolling).
There's also the issue of the interface not being updated after changes and of having to switch panes for the change to be effective or even to reload (reboot?) the whole page (I'm thinking of setting up auto-provisioning in AzureAD apps).