Ask HN: Which abandoned proprietary software would you resurrect?
811–820 of 837 posts
Re: Ask HN: Which abandoned proprietary software would you resurrect?
#812Edit.com - Windows command promt text editor I also wish linux had such an editor.
The amazing thing about it was that even in pure DOS, with no Win 3.1 running, it lets you use your mouse too in the editor (provided that you have drivers set up right in config.sys etc.), I guess in a similar way as how DOS games use the mouse.
Re: Ask HN: Which abandoned proprietary software would you resurrect?
#813Is no one going to mention Pebble? It's the only smartwatch I've ever wanted, and I was so sad that it got bought and died right when I had enough money to spend some on a smart watch. It just had the perfect combo of good design, long battery life, and usability.
I have one sitting in my drawer; happy to send to you for free if you're interested in owning one. Just drop me a line.
Re: Ask HN: Which abandoned proprietary software would you resurrect?
#814Jasc Paint Shop Pro - before Corel picked them up and gave the software a horrible identity crisis. It had all the right features for graphics editing targeted at the web. Mixing vector layers with raster layers, both fully featured, is still something many modern programs either don't have, or half-ass. And it was dirt cheap, compared to the competition.
Re: Ask HN: Which abandoned proprietary software would you resurrect?
#815Xmarks Being able to pretty seamlessly synchronise bookmarks across browsers was awesome. Its shuttering was the final impetus that made me move away from the decaying mess that is Lastpass. (Hello BitWarden!)
https://www.xbrowsersync.org/ Optionally you can host your own server.
Thanks.
Re: Ask HN: Which abandoned proprietary software would you resurrect?
#816Picasa (desktop app). It hit a sweet spot for me - linux compatible, very easy to do the majority of simple edits (crop, rotate, colour tweaks), and a few other nice features. The only significant failing was that it couldn't handle removable media at all well. Shotwell is the best I've found so far, but it's not quite the right feature balance for me. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Picasa https://en.wikipedia.org/wik…
I have found Pix to be the good replacement of Picasa. https://github.com/linuxmint/pix
Re: Ask HN: Which abandoned proprietary software would you resurrect?
#817Re: Ask HN: Which abandoned proprietary software would you resurrect?
#818There are many abandoned software projects that I would be interested in, although I would like such abandoned proprietary software to be released as FOSS in order that they can be developed/enhanced more.
Re: Ask HN: Which abandoned proprietary software would you resurrect?
#819Picasa (desktop app). It hit a sweet spot for me - linux compatible, very easy to do the majority of simple edits (crop, rotate, colour tweaks), and a few other nice features. The only significant failing was that it couldn't handle removable media at all well. Shotwell is the best I've found so far, but it's not quite the right feature balance for me. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Picasa https://en.wikipedia.org/wik…
I missed it too! After the Nth photo sharing website that I'd early-adopted decided to close up shop, I determined I wanted to own the next solution I invested time into, and I founded PhotoStructure. I've got 20-odd hard drives from laptops and servers and backups. No software that I tried, either open or closed source, would do what I wanted: organize everything into a nice, timestamped, deduped folder structure. M…