Earlier quoted context omitted.
Filtering out news with (probably more than) some bias seems dangerous in encouraging echo chambers. I have been extremely happy to find https://www.allsides.com/ Especially when it surfaces a topic with three articles from across the bias spectrum, it feels very rewarding being able to get a fuller picture.
Sometimes there aren't multiple sides, especially when it comes to science reporting. You have fact-based reporting, and then you have conspiracy theories. How would you handle news where there is sufficient evidence to show one set of reporting is accurate and relatively unbiased, but another report is all made up and designed to inflame its audience?
Admittedly it takes more time to do this, and I can see not being able to invest that in a general sense. I personally think it's worth it.