Live data from Hacker News

Ask HN: What have you built more than twice and wish someone had built for you?

news.ycombinator.com

81–90 of 95 posts

Re: Ask HN: What have you built more than twice and wish someone had built for you?

#81
post #71

I wrote a web app that moved paper-based funding submission and grant management online. A second client wanted the same thing, so I wrote it again with newer tech. When the third client asked for the same thing I spent eighteen months creating a customisable framework, which is in use for increasing numbers of clients.

Is this basically upload, OCR, and storage?

Re: Ask HN: What have you built more than twice and wish someone had built for you?

#82
post #22

Earlier quoted context omitted.

To each it's own, but 1Password security design looks pretty solid. Here is their white paper: https://1passwordstatic.com/files/security/1password-white-p...

You're right. I'm sure their security design is 100% bulletproof and none of my sensitive data will ever be leaked. And even if it were somehow possible for it to be leaked, I'm also sure the company would be completely forthcoming as quickly as possible.

It'll be better than rolling your own password manager and self-hosting it for your team.

Re: Ask HN: What have you built more than twice and wish someone had built for you?

#83
post #69

Earlier quoted context omitted.

No, not to host paperless-ng for me. I also don't mean send them physical documents. I'll be scanning the documents myself of course. I mean a hosted service that I can use from my desktop or phone to upload documents quickly. It should also provide integration with my email with the ability to add rules regarding certain email senders and converting email content to PDF where possible (for the cases where the sender…

Can you list features? This sounds like a good/quick microsaas idea, maybe we can team up on it. Any idea if others would pay for something like this? Am I right thinking the features are: - Ability to upload docs (perhaps w/ multiple integrations, drive, dropbox, etc. - Imap connection to only temporarily read/store email to check the sender or content (possibly using some ai as well?) to then convert specific mails…

It would be better to continue to explore the problem than to begin solutioning.

Re: Ask HN: What have you built more than twice and wish someone had built for you?

#84
post #28

The programmable web. A singular gateway to a programmatic way in which you not only consume data but also services. It doesn't exist. We have a very fragmented ecosystem of http based services mixed with html, APIs and everything requires an account or credit card. I'd kill for one way to access everything in a programmatic way through one gateway. Tried to approach this in numerous ways and continually failed. Edit…

This is more likely to happen in crypto than any other ecosystem. The permissionless composabiblity is driving an insane amount of innovation.

Re: Ask HN: What have you built more than twice and wish someone had built for you?

#85
post #26

A sane build system + package management solution for C++. I have to cobble it together via CMake + Conan every time and I'm praying I get put on a new Rust project someday, but my position and sizeable comp are mainly for being a "legacy janitor".

Have you tried gn or bazel?

I have advocated to at least try bazel (or even buck), but the higher-ranking devs all say that it's too much "organizational knowledge risk", i.e. if I force something unfamiliar onto the team and they only shakily know how to work with it with my help and then I leave, they're screwed. Therefore, it usually boils down to trusty old crusty tools.

Crabs in a bucket.

Re: Ask HN: What have you built more than twice and wish someone had built for you?

#86

A sane build system + package management solution for C++. I have to cobble it together via CMake + Conan every time and I'm praying I get put on a new Rust project someday, but my position and sizeable comp are mainly for being a "legacy janitor".

It can't be done for C++ unless you massively constrain the problem. Trivial example: libfftw3 has --enable-threads and --enable-float configure/compile time options. Your project may need/want both, one or neither of these options (it may, in fact, want two different versions of the library). Rust "proposes" to deal with this by essentially compiling its libraries as a part of building your project (ie. "vendoring"…

I have tried to figure out how to use Nix as a package manager to deal with this, but it is still too much wizardry for me to wrap my head around.

Re: Ask HN: What have you built more than twice and wish someone had built for you?

#87
post #84
post #28

The programmable web. A singular gateway to a programmatic way in which you not only consume data but also services. It doesn't exist. We have a very fragmented ecosystem of http based services mixed with html, APIs and everything requires an account or credit card. I'd kill for one way to access everything in a programmatic way through one gateway. Tried to approach this in numerous ways and continually failed. Edit…

This is more likely to happen in crypto than any other ecosystem. The permissionless composabiblity is driving an insane amount of innovation.

The issue with crypto is no one is really defining a protocol in the way we used to used to understand internet protocols. I'm all for blockchain and P2P but only where it makes sense. I've tried to understand how that would work here but it feels like it's going to be a natural and slow evolution.

Re: Ask HN: What have you built more than twice and wish someone had built for you?

#88

A local dev environment that works. Doing this again, and again, and again.... ...truly sucks. After not working on a codebase for a year, or two, I usually need to set up everything again -- and often run into very stupid/pointless issues that waste an hour, and often much more, just to get to the point where I can start the actual coding process. This is pretty much why I've stopped coding. I don't have the time to…

We had a session here where someone explained how you can use a docker container with VS code to have reproducible local env (for the whole team).

Seem like you never got on board the declarative-infra-as-code boat, it's actually rekindling my software flame, with things like docker-compose and NixOS, everything you ever work on can be stored as code, and set up with 0 effort.

Re: Ask HN: What have you built more than twice and wish someone had built for you?

#89
post #26

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Have you tried gn or bazel?

I have advocated to at least try bazel (or even buck), but the higher-ranking devs all say that it's too much "organizational knowledge risk", i.e. if I force something unfamiliar onto the team and they only shakily know how to work with it with my help and then I leave, they're screwed. Therefore, it usually boils down to trusty old crusty tools. Crabs in a bucket.

They're not wrong though; if you want to introduce a new tool - especially one as large and complicated as Bazel - you need to also take ownership of training and hiring not just yourself (assuming you're not already a Bazel expert) but all your current and future colleagues yourself. The management has to make a cost / benefit analysis and it's not in Bazel's favor.

Bazel is a tool by and for Google scale companies, which 99% of tech companies aren't. Make and co are good enough for most use cases.

Re: Ask HN: What have you built more than twice and wish someone had built for you?

#90

My parent's computers. In the ancient times known as "the 90s" you could find PC technicians who would run anti-malware, dig into the register, and overall tune your computer while leaving everything more-or-less as it was. Those technicians are long gone, replaced by people who make easy money by wiping your computer clean and putting your old files in a folder called "Backup". I'd gladly pay someone to do it right,…

I was one of those, but I was just a late teen going to school for it. TBF, in some cases a wipe was the better and faster option. Modern day PCs and laptops are (should be) set up so that user folders are on a separate partition, and a hidden partition to reinstall the operating system while leaving the user's files alone. Should be, anyway.
Post reply on HN