Live data from Hacker News

Ask HN: For those who use Chrome, why do you?

news.ycombinator.com

81–90 of 118 posts

Re: Ask HN: For those who use Chrome, why do you?

#81
post #30

Chrome tab bar reduces width and overflows, Firefox tab bar scrolls That’s makes chrome more power user friendly. Sadly

Firefox also has vertical tab extensions you could switch on as needed.

Vertical tabs mean that all web sites (that are usually built to be somewhat symmetric) are no longer centered on the screen

Re: Ask HN: For those who use Chrome, why do you?

#82
post #50
post #30

Chrome tab bar reduces width and overflows, Firefox tab bar scrolls That’s makes chrome more power user friendly. Sadly

To me it's the opposite! I'm a tab hoarder. A tab bar like ||||||||||||||||||| is unusable, but Firefox's approach scales infinitely (and I'm on track to have inifinity+1 tabs open)

I’m a tab hoarder as well. I often have 500+ tabs open.

Usually that means I open a ton of windows and can still see all the tabs in each window

Re: Ask HN: For those who use Chrome, why do you?

#83

One reason is that chrome vulnerabilities are between 3 and 5 times more expensive. And thus, I would guess, more rare. Sources: https://www.zerodium.com/program.html https://www.zerodayinitiative.com/blog/2021/1/25/announcing-...

Super interesting way to look at it! Though I think you could make the argument that they're also more expensive because their potential impact is so much huger because of the size of the user base? i.e. maybe noone cares about Firefox vulns because if you land one you're only going to hit some tiny percentage of users.

Re: Ask HN: For those who use Chrome, why do you?

#84
post #80

* Switched a couple of years ago from Firefox because of better dev tools. * GPU acceleration doesn't work properly with Firefox/Linux (Dell G5 SE, Ryzen 4800H). Some sites I use daily, such as Google Maps, are painfully slow/laggy on Firefox. * There's something about the Firefox's scrolling behaviour that I find really annoying. * It works well across all platforms (Firefox on Android wasn't great last time I check…

You don't consider tracking your location against your explicit settings a betrayal? Or the pushing of AMP? https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2018/aug/13/google-lo...

I've enabled the Timeline feature in Google Maps, which records everywhere I go. The benefit I get out of that feature outweighs the privacy concerns for me.

Since I use Google as my main search engine, Google already knows what I've clicked on, so in that case AMP is just an annoyance, not a privacy concern.

Google spent enormous efforts to make the internet fast (Chrome, V8, QUIC, SPDY & HTTP/2, BBR, TLS 1.3, etc.) I will give them the benefit of the doubt that they developed AMP for performance reasons and not for tracking reasons.

I'm personally less concerned about the recording of the data, than the security of the data. Leaks due to security incomptence (e.g. the Facebook leak) seem like a much bigger imminent threat to me.

Re: Ask HN: For those who use Chrome, why do you?

#85

* Switched a couple of years ago from Firefox because of better dev tools. * GPU acceleration doesn't work properly with Firefox/Linux (Dell G5 SE, Ryzen 4800H). Some sites I use daily, such as Google Maps, are painfully slow/laggy on Firefox. * There's something about the Firefox's scrolling behaviour that I find really annoying. * It works well across all platforms (Firefox on Android wasn't great last time I check…

> * It works well across all platforms (Firefox on Android wasn't great last time I checked).

I've made Firefox my default browser on Android a couple of months ago and I'd say it's basically completely usable at this point.

I am running it with NoScript on, which is probably more of an exercise in masochism than anything else - more or less every site loads broken, of course, without JS these days, and a recent change to the Firefox addon interface means selectively enabling scripts to get it working is a multi-tap pain in the ass. I am probably going to switch to uBlock Origin (which someone here mentioned works now in FF mobile).

Performance wise I'd say it's probably a bit slower but still perfectly usable (running it on a Pixel 3 and a Motorola OneVision).

I enabled sync on it as well, with an account created just to sync between my two mobile devices, and it works fine.

Re: Ask HN: For those who use Chrome, why do you?

#86
post #46
post #35

I don't but I can share a reason someone I know uses it instead of Firefox: profile switcher. In Chrome you have pretty little button you click on that lists all your profiles in a nice looking way; with two actions you're done. In Firefox, you have to type about:profiles, you get a horrendously looking list with all sorts of useless information, it's just a pain to access and look at. Implement the same UX Chrome ha…

Not sure what your use case is, but Firefox’s containers might solve your problem with the older profile system: https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/multi-account...

Containers are 1000 times better than profiles!

Re: Ask HN: For those who use Chrome, why do you?

#87
post #44
post #29

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I need to try this. Are those features available on Android too?

I don't have Android, but it can't hurt to check: https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/android/addon/multi-account...

Nope, but that is OK. I can use this capability on my laptop at times. Somehow I just missed it.

Re: Ask HN: For those who use Chrome, why do you?

#88
I use a Chromebook as my main computer and development system. No other real option. Chrome runs fast and reliably on ChromeOS.

On my iPad and iPhone I use Safari.

I mainly do web development. Anecdotally I hear about more problems from Firefox users than from Chrome, Safari, or Edge users. Sometimes that's not a problem with Firefox but it does seem to exist as the outlier.

Re: Ask HN: For those who use Chrome, why do you?

#89
post #33
post #23

Earlier quoted context omitted.

If privacy + security is your goal, you ought to change from Chrome to Brave. Brave is Chromium-based but actually protects your privacy. If privacy above all is your goal, then Firefox is your best bet.

Brave have been caught with their fingers in the cookie jar multiple times. I don't know if it's more secure than Firefox but it's definitely less private.

Source?

Re: Ask HN: For those who use Chrome, why do you?

#90
post #80

Earlier quoted context omitted.

You don't consider tracking your location against your explicit settings a betrayal? Or the pushing of AMP? https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2018/aug/13/google-lo...

I've enabled the Timeline feature in Google Maps, which records everywhere I go. The benefit I get out of that feature outweighs the privacy concerns for me. Since I use Google as my main search engine, Google already knows what I've clicked on, so in that case AMP is just an annoyance, not a privacy concern. Google spent enormous efforts to make the internet fast (Chrome, V8, QUIC, SPDY & HTTP/2, BBR, TLS 1.3, etc.)…

So Google never betrayed your trust because they simply haven't needed to - you gave them everything willingly.
Post reply on HN