Ask HN: Famous anonymous inventions other than Bitcoin?
81–90 of 146 posts
Re: Ask HN: Famous anonymous inventions other than Bitcoin?
#82Earlier quoted context omitted.
I find the bearing more significant than the wheel: without a good bearing its utility is limited. They have a rich history it seems: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bearing_(mechanical)#History
True, but to invent the bearing you need to invent the wheel first
Re: Ask HN: Famous anonymous inventions other than Bitcoin?
#83The Stuxnet worm.
EDIT: although I do agree, I remember first reading about Stuxnet when it was first discovered, before evidence of its origin was known, and being absolutely fascinated
Re: Ask HN: Famous anonymous inventions other than Bitcoin?
#84Many women published research under pseudonyms in the past, for example Sophie Germain: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sophie_Germain So I'd argue that many past inventions that are credited to men might actually have been achieved by women scientists publishing under their husbands / colleagues / friends name as a pseudonym. In Paris I once saw an original print of Marie Curie's book on radioactivity, where her name…
Nothing to do with publishing difficulties at all. It was simply the way a married French woman would be addressed at the time - as "Madame [husband's full name]", eg Michelle Obama would be "Mme Barack Obama". (It's still in use in more formal / old-fashioned contexts.) The reader would understand that the author of the book was Pierre Curie's wife, rather than him.
Re: Ask HN: Famous anonymous inventions other than Bitcoin?
#85Many women published research under pseudonyms in the past, for example Sophie Germain: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sophie_Germain So I'd argue that many past inventions that are credited to men might actually have been achieved by women scientists publishing under their husbands / colleagues / friends name as a pseudonym. In Paris I once saw an original print of Marie Curie's book on radioactivity, where her name…
Re: Ask HN: Famous anonymous inventions other than Bitcoin?
#86Think about it, nobody knows who invented the ability to control fire, and yet it is still, by far, the most important technology in our lives. The largest economic sector is oil and gas, in other words, finding things to set on fire. All of our technology is powered by electricity, which is still predominantly generated by setting things on fire. Rockets are powered by fire. Guns are powered by fire. Cars are mostly powered by fire. Even if we switch to renewable, GHG-neutral sources of energy, that is only possible because of millennia of fire. Hell, we only evolved big brains in the first place because we unlocked tons of extra nutrients by cooking with fire.
Re: Ask HN: Famous anonymous inventions other than Bitcoin?
#87Re: Ask HN: Famous anonymous inventions other than Bitcoin?
#88Many women published research under pseudonyms in the past, for example Sophie Germain: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sophie_Germain So I'd argue that many past inventions that are credited to men might actually have been achieved by women scientists publishing under their husbands / colleagues / friends name as a pseudonym. In Paris I once saw an original print of Marie Curie's book on radioactivity, where her name…
A few related links:
https://theculturetrip.com/north-america/usa/articles/12-fem...
https://jezebel.com/homme-de-plume-what-i-learned-sending-my...
http://introductionsnecessary.com/2016/06/14/wang-zhenyi/
(Yes, I realize my sources are about mostly writers, not scientists.)
Re: Ask HN: Famous anonymous inventions other than Bitcoin?
#89Earlier quoted context omitted.
The 1911 Solvay Conference photo illustrates just how exceptional a woman scientist was then: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Solvay_Conference she's there at the table with Henri Poincaré.
The amount of brainpower in that room is incredible. Now think about it this way: probably half of what was available at the time got lost somehow. Makes you wonder where we'd be technologically if we had not systematically repressed one half of the possible scientists. On the positive side: probably a lot of that research got done anyway, with some guy taking credit for it.