Live data from Hacker News

Ask HN: Are you working on interesting technical problems?

news.ycombinator.com

81–90 of 441 posts

Re: Ask HN: Are you working on interesting technical problems?

#81
It's a mix between technical problems and design but I'm working on making the law-making process more transparent and part of the challenge it to show meaningful diffs for each change. Concretely, we would like to parse each amendment, apply them to the text proposal and then apply the proposal to the current legislation.

TL;DR: putting the laws into git

Re: Ask HN: Are you working on interesting technical problems?

#82

You might as well have asked who among us won the lottery. I've been struggling with this for years now; after 4 boring jobs I finally gave up even the expectation that what I'll be asked to do will be even remotely interesting (or socially useful). The chance of landing an interesting job is absolutely minuscule - the market rewards whatever it rewards at the moment, and that's where jobs flock. These days, one of t…

Can relate to this 100%, at the moment I'm trying to enter teaching, for me that feels like a good focus if you aim for "interesting outcomes"

Re: Ask HN: Are you working on interesting technical problems?

#83

We are developing a matter compiler. We are working on designing molecular Lego to assemble them into new catalysts, therapeutic compounds, atomically precise membranes and sensors for proteins and small molecules. The goal is to make molecules that can do everything that proteins can do and that can be designed by human beings with computer assistance. We've developed a programming environment with a custom compiler…

do you do remote?

Re: Ask HN: Are you working on interesting technical problems?

#84
post #8

Academics: just take an interesting problem that you can generate potential solutions for, but if you can't, just pick the next problem. Business: here is a continuous stream of problems, most of them are boring, some of them are hard, but you have to solve them all regardless.

Business: take the easiest most profitable problem and solve it... Which is generally a boring problem.

Re: Ask HN: Are you working on interesting technical problems?

#86

You might as well have asked who among us won the lottery. I've been struggling with this for years now; after 4 boring jobs I finally gave up even the expectation that what I'll be asked to do will be even remotely interesting (or socially useful). The chance of landing an interesting job is absolutely minuscule - the market rewards whatever it rewards at the moment, and that's where jobs flock. These days, one of t…

You have found the boundaries of the box, and anything you find outside the box will be judged against everything inside the box. There are a lot of people inside the box, and the box is small, so they make a lot of noise. When you get outside of the box you need to also get away from the box so that you can't hear the judging.

Wow, very nicely put.

> ...also get away from [the people in] the box...

This may be the harder part. I consider some of the people in the box to be friends. But then again, if I think about it... maybe they're outside the box too, but we're on opposite faces, and so close to it that we are still looking at each other _through_ the box.

Re: Ask HN: Are you working on interesting technical problems?

#87
post #60

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Any paper that generates or analyzes draft genomes is a waste of money.

I’ve been out of the genome-sequencing space for quite a few years now, but that seems a pretty strong assertion and I’m curious about your rationale. Is it that the analysis will need to be re-done in future? Or do you think the space is saturated?

I left the game in 2015, but even then third generation sequencing could close bacterial genomes for < $1k. Long reads make it trivial to detect all sorts of stuff (sample mixup, contamination, phage activity, in vitro evolution) that goes unnoticed with short reads. Since the conclusion of large scale draft genome sequencing papers always seems to be 'we need a bigger sample size' anyway, I feel the money would be better spent on studying individual strains of bacteria.

Re: Ask HN: Are you working on interesting technical problems?

#88

You might as well have asked who among us won the lottery. I've been struggling with this for years now; after 4 boring jobs I finally gave up even the expectation that what I'll be asked to do will be even remotely interesting (or socially useful). The chance of landing an interesting job is absolutely minuscule - the market rewards whatever it rewards at the moment, and that's where jobs flock. These days, one of t…

> Maybe I'm just realizing something obvious that parents should have taught me when I was a kid. I don't know. Maybe it was wrong of me to seek meaning in the things one does? Maybe that approach is no longer supported by our civilization?

Ouch, this resonated. I've been walking this path with you.

Sometimes I make my own food. Or grow it. Or pickle it. It would be more "efficient" to buy such food in many cases. But if it gives me pleasure, I trade my time to do it.

My opinion: the point of life is not to acquire so much money that you can avoid doing any difficult things and wrap yourself in a cocoon of comfort. The point of life is to find your own good life and live it. That will entail some difficulties (at a minimum the difficulty of seeking your own definition of the good life, which is hard!). You may find that in your work (lucky you!) or you may have to work to support yourself and find this good life in other areas.

Re: Ask HN: Are you working on interesting technical problems?

#89

I think about this a lot. With the rise of cloud computing, I wonder if what I am doing is even programming. I even searched Stack Overflow recently to see if working on complex configurations counts as programming or not. There obviously wasn't consensus. I saved this thread to "read later" in the hope that I can identify how to get into a position where I am working on interesting problems but more or less, I imple…

I'm not sure about "Software Engineering", but "Programming" to me sounds like making a computer run something to your liking, which would include configuring it.

IMO the problem is that today we generally still only have one name for all of these jobs (software dev|engineer) when it reality we probably need 2 or 3. It makes planning one's career and searching for the right job very difficult.

Re: Ask HN: Are you working on interesting technical problems?

#90
I think you are expecting 2 different goals to align itself for you: 1) work on interesting project 2) to be paid salary for it.

It rarely happens. If working on interesting project is very important for you, you can do it as side project or start up. Or, seek out specific department in companies where such interesting work is happening. You might also have to sacrifice some amount of salary to work in such companies/startup.

Post reply on HN