Live data from Hacker News

Ask HN: Best ultrabook for Linux?

news.ycombinator.com

81–87 of 87 posts

Re: Ask HN: Best ultrabook for Linux?

#81
post #69

Earlier quoted context omitted.

And updated UX305CA works great with a 4.5 kernel.

How do you get on with the CPU - is the Core M series much different in practice?

Well, I wouldn't run Gentoo on it. Compiling Chromium takes about a day, and I'm not a big multimedia user. But in day-to-day development work (both client-side and server-side) I've never had any issues. I had actually forgotten it's a Core M.

Re: Ask HN: Best ultrabook for Linux?

#82

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I'm in the same boat, and I have to use Vagrant + VirtualBox for just about anything docker related.

Not anymore :) https://blog.docker.com/2016/03/docker-for-mac-windows-beta/

Nice! I just joined the waitlist.

Managing docker-machines manually on non-Linux platforms was really starting to get tedious. Hoping this works as seamlessly as I imagine it would.

Re: Ask HN: Best ultrabook for Linux?

#83

Chromebook Pixel has been an awesome sometimes-Linux laptop for me. I'm still spending most of my time in ChromeOS, but the crouton project/extension allows me to have another linux chroot running for when I need to do work. There's a number of supported distros, although I've stuck with Ubuntu and XFCE, mostly because it stays out of my way. The fact that you can have the entire chroot or an individual app run in a…

I feel like the 64GB SSD would be really limiting for development, though. I'm using about 200GB of space on my work machine, and I don't think I'm doing anything crazy with it.

Re: Ask HN: Best ultrabook for Linux?

#84
post #32

Earlier quoted context omitted.

How is the build quality? I've had Dell laptops in the past given to me by my employer and the screen hinge has been a source of failure on two of them.

The touchpad on the skylake 13 is bad (not sure if it is broken).

Macbook touchpads are still a tier above the rest, but the Skylake XPS touchpads are pretty good (and better than the previous XPS 13) based on the reviews.

Re: Ask HN: Best ultrabook for Linux?

#85
post #74
post #51

I've been using the Razer Blade 2015 and I highly recommend it. It's expensive, but the machine itself has Macbook-level build quality and internals. The screen is great and everything works out of the box with Ubuntu. While I do have dual-boot set up, I run Ubuntu 95% of the time and it's been basically flawless. (Caveat: I haven't tried the webcam or hibernate, and I don't use the Nvidia card.) It's by far the best…

Just in case others are looking at Blades... My 2012 blade went in for repairs several times and has the worst keyboard I've ever used on a laptop. I don't know if they've improved their quality control any, but AFAIK they're still using terrible keyboards. Be careful and try one out before you commit!

Personally I've found the keyboard on mine to be just fine, but I'm using a 2015, not a 2012. For those of you who are interested in a try-before-you-buy, when I was shopping around they were selling them at Microsoft stores and had a demo unit set up for people to play with.

Re: Ask HN: Best ultrabook for Linux?

#86

I can endorse the Dell XPS13 9343: small, light, great battery life, great screen/keyboard. It's not perfect, but it's pretty good. Some folks decided to replace the Broadcom wifi with Intel, because it's not ideal for linux. I believe that the newest XPS13 uses Intel instead.

[deleted]

Re: Ask HN: Best ultrabook for Linux?

#87
post #58
post #52

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I'm pretty salty about Dell these days. I recommended my grandparents get a Dell so I wouldn't have to do too much tech support (I'm really rusty at Windows these days), and Dell decided that a machine manufactured and purchased in late 2012 is "too old" for them to bother making working Windows 10 drivers for. That's some real bullshit there. Of course, Microsoft has no idea, so the machine gets updated to Windows 1…

I in-place upgraded three computers to Windows 10. All three had serious problems with the upgrade. On one the graphics became slow because it had Intel HD 3000 which apparently doesn't work well in Windows 10. On another the monitor would not turn on when resuming from sleep. On the third, the entire installation screwed up and required a wholesale reinstallation. Those were one HP, one Lenovo, and one homegrown PC.…

I can certainly blame Dell for not supporting a Windows upgrade for computer that was only 2.5 year old on retail release, never mind previews and betas. It means they see their computers as disposable objects almost immediately after purchase, so why would I ever purchase one?
Post reply on HN