Live data from Hacker News

Ask HN: Which abandoned proprietary software would you resurrect?

news.ycombinator.com

771–780 of 837 posts

Re: Ask HN: Which abandoned proprietary software would you resurrect?

#771
post #693

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Wait, what do you mean? The current owner of Symbolics authorized the development of a new I-Machine emulator? Who is working on it, Kalman Reti and Brad Parker? This is very interesting news, please elaborate.

I don’t think Brad Parker is involved. You can email Reti for more information.

What is his current email address? The one at symbolics-dks.com?

Re: Ask HN: Which abandoned proprietary software would you resurrect?

#772

Windows Phone. To this day no Android phone I've used ever as fast, reliable or plain refined as WP8 was. Unique design and many genuinely useful features, and it reflected a time when smartphones could have been vibrant and diverse, not our current two mega-platforms or nothing.

Why doesn't Microsoft just open-source the windows phone OS as an android alternative ?

The Windows Phone OS is built on the same parts as the Windows desktop OS. They aren’t going to open source that.

Re: Ask HN: Which abandoned proprietary software would you resurrect?

#773
post #739

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It’s broken insofar as there isn’t a complete and coherent “developer story” for building a Windows desktop application that doesn’t look like it came from the 1990s. I call it “the Photoshop test”: Pretend you’re Adobe and you just invented Photoshop in 2018. How do you build the GUI for each desktop operating system? ...considering you need to do things like OpenGL hardware acceleration, 30-bit color, support binar…

Why is the sandboxing such a big issue in the case of a “Photoshop” app? The UWP api seem to cover most OS services that the devs would need, or am I missing something?

UWP with its XAML framework forces you to use Direct3D, there’s no way to use OpenGL efficiently - you also are forced to surrender a lot of control to the OS, for example, all Windows Store games must use Direct3D and were forced to use VSync until very recently. As a developer it means you can’t do anything cutting-edge until after both Microsoft and NVIDIA/AMD say-so and officially support some feature. This is the unfortunate consequence of UWP’s style of API sandboxing (compared to, for example, a hypervisor approach with end-user approved red-pilling). If you were Adobe it would be difficult to maintain your reputation as the leading vendor for desktop graphics and media software if you were artificially constrained by other companies who haven’t demonstrated commitment to supporting novel platforms beyond a couple of release cycles (see: WinJS, WinRT, Windows 8 XAML, etc).

Re: Ask HN: Which abandoned proprietary software would you resurrect?

#775
post #156

* Windows Phone. We need a third viable option in the mobile space. This week we are concerned about the loss of a browser engine, recognizing this is unhealthy for the market. Windows Phone was terrific in many ways and recent concepts by fans such as @boxnwhisker (Harry Dohyun Kim) [1] show how beautiful the Metro design could be today. * Microsoft Image Composer. A little known sprite-oriented graphic arts program…

Yes, +1 for Windows phone! I found it much easier to use than the iPhone in general, apart from its lack of apps (which of course is what killed it).

Re: Ask HN: Which abandoned proprietary software would you resurrect?

#776

Picasa (desktop app). It hit a sweet spot for me - linux compatible, very easy to do the majority of simple edits (crop, rotate, colour tweaks), and a few other nice features. The only significant failing was that it couldn't handle removable media at all well. Shotwell is the best I've found so far, but it's not quite the right feature balance for me. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Picasa https://en.wikipedia.org/wik…

I am still mad at Google for killing this project. Picasa was the best photo app EVER! It was also very commonly used among genealogists and in genealogy centers where visitors often have low computer literacy. The facial recognition was fantastic! As far as I know, it all ran locally. It was great to be able to just select a person and go through all of the photos with that person in them. Great for genalogy, too. I wish they would open the source code on this!

Re: Ask HN: Which abandoned proprietary software would you resurrect?

#778
post #584

Google docs but private. (So back when it was private which I assume it was at some point)

Collabora is just like libre office. It is essentially a libre office thin client. The downside is that it loads an entire libre office on the server with every open window on it. I would like to try OnlyOffice sometime as the developers say it is a client side webapp. They also say they aim for maximum compatibility with MS Office. I am surprised it gets little mention on HN.

It’s a toss up between paying someone $20/mo to host it or paying Google $3/month not to read your info.

Re: Ask HN: Which abandoned proprietary software would you resurrect?

#779
post #552

Edit.com - Windows command promt text editor I also wish linux had such an editor.

It isn't exactly the same, but mcedit tends to be very dos editor-like (and as a sidenote, i always find it weird that Linux/Unix console programs look so primitive compared to similar programs for DOS).

Thanks I'll check it out, when I get back to my Linux machine. I agree with you that linux file editors look very primitive compared to what was available on DOS.
Post reply on HN