Earlier quoted context omitted.
I'd prefer a more substantive critique than an ad-hominem statement
That is not an ad hominem statement. It is an opinion about how overblown the idea is and why George is famous for it. Some property tax is probably a good idea. Does this dude deserve credit for the idea? No. Is he right in asserting that all poverty results from a lack of access to land? No. Will property tax make the economy go brrr? No. The idea of choosing the uses of land by taxing the hell out of random entiti…
Even more impressive, it’s obvious you haven’t even read a decent critique or summary of it.
You should consider it! There’s a reason for its stature :)