Live data from Hacker News

Ask HN: Is S3 down?

news.ycombinator.com

701–710 of 1001 posts

Re: Ask HN: Is S3 down?

#701

Earlier quoted context omitted.

In December 2015 I received an e-mail with the following subject line from AWS, around 4 am in the morning: "Amazon EC2 Instance scheduled for retirement" When I checked the logs it was clear the hardware failed 30 mins before they scheduled it for retirement. EC2 and root device data was gone. The e-mail also said "you may have already lost data". So I know that Amazon schedules servers for retirement after they alr…

That's completely ridiculous, get some fucking RAID Amazon. I order drives off newegg directly to my DC and I'm yet to lose data with the cheapest drives available in RAID10.

Yes, the only way a server can die is from non-raided disks.

Re: Ask HN: Is S3 down?

#702
post #701

Earlier quoted context omitted.

That's completely ridiculous, get some fucking RAID Amazon. I order drives off newegg directly to my DC and I'm yet to lose data with the cheapest drives available in RAID10.

Yes, the only way a server can die is from non-raided disks.

Otherwise they should at least be providing customers their data back.

Re: Ask HN: Is S3 down?

#704
post #476

Can anyone comment on mitigating issues like this with S3 Cross-region replication? I'm reading up on it now while one of my services is dead in the water.

The only appropriate comment is that this issue is affecting all of our buckets, both in us-west and us-east. Replicating to another region would yield no useful benefits in this specific failure scenario.

Can't agree with this. Buckets in eu-west-1 are fine

Re: Ask HN: Is S3 down?

#708
post #196
post #164

Earlier quoted context omitted.

These service health boards are more like advertisement page then actual status of the service.

I guess their bizarre thinking is something along the lines of: "unless we have proof that noone can access the service, we won't change the indicator from green to yellow. Seriously: I don't understand why you guys stay with AWS.

Because you perceive public clouds only as virtual machine providers, that you can replace with other provider in two days. A detailed cloud migration consists of replacing some parts of your software to use managed services provided by a specific cloud provider, and AWS is still has the best service offerings IMHO. When you use these services carefully also you will see that AWS is very cheap and reliable enough. Outages like today's are happening in every platform and it is possible to mitigate them.

You can use Adwords as a self-service user. Without knowing so much of details you can run your ads but also you can bery easily ruin your budget. But many enterprise customers use it very differently than those users and they are extremely optimizing the cost. Cloud is the same. If you don't know how big customers use AWS, it is normal that you are surprised because AWS is still leading the market.

You say GCP is better than AWS. Which part is better? GCP does not have many services of AWS we benefit from. How can you compare totally different providers? You can only say AWS EC2 is worse than GCP. But you cannot compare whole platforms in one sentence.

Re: Ask HN: Is S3 down?

#709
post #706

So S3's been down for at least 3 hours. Does AWS break this year's S3 durability & reliability promise of eleven 9s by now? [1][2] [1]: https://aws.amazon.com/s3/details/ [2]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/High_availability#Percentage_c...

11 9's is durability not availability.

Re: Ask HN: Is S3 down?

#710
So this is particularly weird - one of my instances was showing 0% CPU in CloudWatch (dropped from 60% at the start of the event), but the logs were saying 'load 500'. I ssh'd in... and the problem resolved itself. The only thing I did was run htop to look at the load, and it dropped from 500 (reported in htop) to it's normal level. Just ssh'ing in fixed that issue.
Post reply on HN